Featured

    Choosing New Speakers: Sensitivity and Room Size

    Issue 149

    In a previous article (Issue 147) we considered the reality that, although there is an abundance of information describing the technical specifications of loudspeakers, not all of it is particularly helpful in assisting us in making informed purchasing decisions. The specs don’t give a complete idea of how a speaker will be suited to our listening rooms, or provide an optimal listening distance.

    We also briefly looked at the fact that power handling ratings and frequency response are only part of the picture in telling us about a speaker’s “personality” and potential to deliver volume at our preferred listening levels, because we don’t typically listen to our speakers at their peak output rating, nor can we tell how much power our speaker is delivering at different bandwidths and frequencies across the audio spectrum. It’s worth remembering that often times, nominal test data may be obtained from measurements conducted in an anechoic chamber, and do not directly represent how a loudspeaker may perform in an actual listening environment, or account for different room dimensions, reflections, absorption and even listener preferences for a more bright, forward and lively sound or perhaps a darker or more laid-back tonality.

    We know that if we sit farther away from the speakers, we will lose some of the volume compared to if we sat nearer. If your speakers have been engineered to produce, say, an average of 85 dB output at a given listening position, the location you end up selecting for your seating position may not correspond to this average distance for average volume output. Again, the spec doesn’t provide a useful “real world” measurement. You may think the simple answer is to just turn the volume up or down according to what you are listening to!

    However, any given recording has been made with either incidental, or more commonly, very intentional dynamic ranges from within its quietest and to its loudest parts. It’s safe to say that all of us want to listen to an album’s mix as intended by the engineer, without having to change the volume radically throughout our listening to the piece! Many of us may not enjoy constantly adjusting the volume control (and/or applying some kind of compression like the night mode of an A/V receiver or soundbar) unless perhaps we are listening late at night and being considerate of our neighbors.

    Our listening position can have more of an impact on this than we might at first think. The album Talk by Yes is a great example of a recording with vast dynamic range. A big reason is that it was recorded by producer Trevor Rabin with his pioneering use of Mark of the Unicorn Digital Performer software (now up to Version 11). As Rabin put it in 1994: "…this Talk album, we really went into doing seriously, to do something that hopefully we could say, [in] twenty years’ time, that's one of the things we did that we're really proud of."

    If you love to listen to orchestral music, then you know I am preaching to the converted when it comes to appreciating a recording’s dynamics, from subtle passages to monstrous power that could dust off any Marshall stack!

    So, are there any standards we can adhere to when assessing equipment? A traditional and tested requirement for many mixing rooms is that the front speakers in a multichannel setup should be able to handle peaks of 105 dB across a bandwidth from 80 Hz to 20 kHz (20 dB above the rated average listening volume of 85dB), with the surround speakers at 102 dB covering the same bandwidth range, and subwoofers the capable of producing 115 dB. This starts to provide some context for how we may set our volume levels on our home stereo or surround systems so that they are balanced in the same proportions. If you calibrate your listening volume to something closer to 75 dB, then you afford yourself 10 dB headroom. Also, knowing how loud you like to listen to your music for most of the time gives a great starting point in comparing different speakers at the same volume.

    What if you run a 5.1-channel or bigger system for music and movies? Many films have a mix that is biased in favor of in producing a center channel volume that is 3 dB louder than the front main speakers, and with front main speakers mixed at 3 dB louder than the surrounds. If you are watching a live music Blu-ray (or other format), you may likely notice that the center channel is very prominent, and it requires a lot more power than the other speakers. This can be especially noticeable in dialogue and for vocal performances. For this reason, many tout the center speaker as the most important in a surround sound system, along with the fact that it has an important role in dispersing its sound over an off-axis angle of about 60 degrees to provide adequate room coverage and blend with the main left and right speakers. The takeaway is to keep in mind that, when determining your preferred listening levels and listening position with a surround sound system, you need to consider that the center channel will require more power.

    Of course, your room has a major impact on the volume and the sound your speakers will produce. Examples may include furniture, mirrors, windows, soft furnishings, blankets, bookcases, and of course any dedicated room absorption and dispersion treatments. This is nothing new, but have you considered the following?

     

    The distance from the loudspeakers to the listening position, and the size and furnishings of the room are important factors to consider. From the Klipsch website.

    Klipsch loudspeakers and subwoofer in a surround sound system. From the Klipsch website.

     

    It’s a well-known fact to us audiophiles, that to double the acoustic energy output, we need an increase of +3 dB. So, how does this factor into our thinking about room sizes and the sensitivity ratings of our speakers?

    For a room size of approximately 80 cubic meters (3,000 cubic feet), based on average room reflections and decay times, the measured sensitivity of speakers at the standard one-meter measurement point, translates to -7 dB by the time you get to the average listening position for that room size. This is based on a typical triangular placement of a listening chair between speakers in a room following the IEC dimensions of a 21-foot/6.4m x 16-foot/4.8m x 9-foot/2.7m room. Because of the inverse square law – volume drops off as the square of the distance, not in a linear fashion. Think of it as the sound power being spread out in all directions from the source, a bit like the surface of an inflating balloon skin.

    As you double the distance from the speaker to 2 meters (about 6-1/2 feet), the volume will have dropped by more than 6 dB by the time you hear it at that distance compared to the sound source measured at one meter. If you double the distance again to 4 meters (a little over 13 feet away in a bigger room as illustrated below you will be more than 12 dB down (actually closer to 13 dB) at the listening position.

    In other words, if you are considering buying a speaker with a sensitivity rating of 87 dB, it will translate to a sensitivity of 80 dB at a seating position of a distance a little more than 2 meters (about 6-1/2 feet) away from the speakers. Speakers rated at a sensitivity of 92 dB will be performing at the listening position at a sensitivity of 85 dB. If your speakers have a sensitivity rating of 82 dB then you will have an effective sensitivity at such a seating position of 75 dB – a typical suggested minimum reference volume for a home hi-fi set up. Factor this into your decision-making process when choosing the right speakers for your room size, preferred listening volumes and distance from your speakers.

     

    Sound pressure level vs. distance. From the PUIaudio website.

    Sound pressure level vs. distance. From the PUIaudio website.

     

    So, if you have ever bemoaned the fact that your room isn’t quite as big as you would like it to be, say less than 80 cubic meters (about 2,825 cubic feet), you now have more reason to be happy about the fact that your speakers play louder because you’ll be sitting closer to them and need less amplifier power.

    What about those of us who do have a larger room? If your room is double the previous example’s cubic volume at 160 cubic meters (about 5,650 cubic feet), and assuming the same ceiling height, you’ll need double the amplifier power (for example, from 100 to 200 watts) to hear the same volume as the room which has half of that cubic volume. Why? Because the room volume requires 3 dB more power each time you increase the volume of the room by 80 cubic meters and so you are now down -10dB at the listening position. And, for a room three times the volume at 240 cubic meters (approx. 8.9 x 10 x 2.7 meters or about 8,476 cubic feet), the you must double the power again from 200 to 400 watts, as you lose a further 3 dB and are now -13 dB down from your (anechoic) speaker sensitivity rating at 1 meter. In a room this size, speakers rated at 87 dB will have an effective sensitivity of 74 dB at the listening position.

    Again, although these are only statistical average examples, and your personal mileage may vary a little, they may prove very helpful in making a more informed decision when analyzing speaker specifications, your room size, and amplifier power and headroom requirements to adequately support typical seating position listening volumes. (Note that differences in spectral balance and decay time will alter the perceived volume to some extent).

    You may of course enjoy listening to your speakers more in the near field than at an average listening distance for any given room size. You may also prefer listening to them at below reference levels.

    What other factors can we consider that will help choose a good-sounding speaker? We will consider this in a future article.

    Header image courtesy of Pixabay.com/Tomislav Jakupec.

    11 comments on “Choosing New Speakers: Sensitivity and Room Size”

    1. Thanks, Russ, for an excellent article. Having moved my stereo to a considerably smaller room that happens to be a mere 64 cubic metres, but built with a mix of acoustic materials and judicious furnishings, the sonic experience is vastly improved. It has as much scale, seems more cohesive and is effortless. The only advantage I can imagine for larger rooms is to manage deep bass, which is something I've never enjoyed anyway and have never owned full range speakers.

    2. Great topic, Russ! I wholeheartedly agree...to me, the listening space/room is Very Important to ones final live music reproduction goals!

      For a dedicated 2.1 channel music room, I had no other choice other than a spare 28cm (990cf) bedroom (quasi near-field). Audio wise, it actually works extremely well as the room decor (carpeting, side double french door windows, side double closet panel doors, high ceiling) provides just the right balance for acoustical music...not too live and not too dead! Soundstage is mind blowing, as the holographic presentation extends well past all room boundaries!!

      FWIW, here is a graphic depiction of what I am able to Hear:
      https://i.postimg.cc/ncMzPHQx/Ted-s-Music-Room.png

      Ted

        1. Russ,

          Yes, but since my listening position is only 7ft from the monitor front baffles, the depth of my listening room doesn't allow too much adjustment, or need, to get any closer!

    3. Having read the article I now appreciate more than ever the 94dB sensitivity of my loudspeakers in my large living room. Having high sensitivity speakers allows me to get by with 100w per channel amplifiers whereas if my speakers were only, say, 87dB sensitivity, I would probably have to have 300w per channel amplifiers for the same output.

      1. Hi JosephLG,

        Thank you for your kind comments! It's much appreciated.

        Speakers love power, and you would indeed need 300watts and more, for equivalent listening sound pressure levels at the same distance with 87dB speakers.

    4. If you actually do the math, or use an online calculator, like the one below, you realize that most systems simply don’t have the power to play at reference levels of 105 dB (85 + 20 headroom).

      For example, taking even fairly sensitive 90 dB speakers and assuming a 12 foot seating distance (which is actually quite close, basically near field), you would need an amp that can deliver a power rating of 425W per channel - and that’s without clipping, so not the “rated” output for most amps.

      http://www.mh-audio.nl/Calculators/REAP.html

    5. Hi Irj,

      Thank you for your calculator. It really does serve to illustrate the practical value of higher sensitivity speakers, particularly in large rooms.

      However with 92dB speakers: at 12ft listening at 80dB you still afford 20dB headroom and may reduce the risk of damaging your hearing from prologned listening at 85dB, requiring less than 100 watts (84.5).

      Listening at 78dB at the same distance requires even less at 53.3 watts of power.

    6. Great concise article. Like so many my listening is a compromise by multi use for family activities ( lots of stuff all over the room) I'm a 2 channel guy with 88 dB speaker driven by an a Technics SUG 700 integrated providing 70 watt a channel. I do near field listening. My Canton 9k stand mounted are 8 ft apart as is my listening position from those speakers and JAMO C 80 sub speakers are all 3 ft from the front wall and 5ft or more from the side walls . I find my best music loudness level to be in the 60 dB range into the 70ies. Going into the 80dB gets a bit much for any length of time While the system is a bit under powered in the extreme ie going above 90dB at my listening position as the amp is approaching clipping territory.
      My down side is listening below 60 dB as the sound seems compressed, my speakers do not come alive dynamically until the 60 dB range I suspect all speakers have a range that they excel, their sweet spot if you will. Can that sweet spot be manipulated by the type and power of the amp. I mean 90 dB is 90 dB regardless if it is driven by a class A , A/B , or D powered amp correct? Would a less neutral sounding set up might make the 90 dB more tolerable to listen to even though the sound pressure is the same?

    7. What if your room is not 32 feet in length to support low frequencies. My speakers are 97 db efficient so the cabinets are large. I do not understand how your equation would work in my environment. My equation works.

    Leave a Reply

    Also From This Issue

    Stage Door Tommy

    It's never too early for a young boy to start…

    Music In Hyperspace

    Beck in concert at the Brooklyn Bowl, Las Vegas, during…

    Bonnie Raitt: Someone to Talk About

    For two decades, Bonnie Raitt was no big star but…

    Burt Bacharach, Part Four: Make Way for More Dionne Warwick

    I previously covered a list of some of Dionne Warwick’s…
    Subscribe to Copper Magazine and never miss an issue.

    © 2022 PS Audio, Inc.

    linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram