COPPER

A PS Audio Publication

Issue 43 • Free Online Magazine

Issue 43 QUIBBLES AND BITS

Of Mirrors, and Combs

Mirror, mirror, on the wall…

Here’s a quick challenge for you.  When you look at something in a mirror, why is the image always reversed left-to-right, and never top-to-bottom?  Think about that for a minute.  Always left-to-right.  But never top-to-bottom.

Now lie down on the floor in front of the mirror, with the mirror at your side.  Now the image is reversed top-to-bottom, but not left-to right.

Go read some of the other columns now, and come back to this when you think you have a watertight explanation.  And then read the answer below ….

… Who is The Fairest of Them All?

Suppose you and your identical twin stand face to face.  If I ask both of you to point left, each will point to a different side.  If I asked you both to point forwards, you would point at each other, again in opposite directions.  On the other hand, if I had asked both of you to point West, or North, you would both point in the same direction.  By stipulating Left/Right and Forward/Backward, I am stipulating a frame of reference which is different for both you and your twin.  Does this help?  No, not really.  But I will come back to it.

Consider, as someone once said to Bill Clinton, the optics of the problem.  What we see in the mirror is what we call a Virtual Image.  This means that the light rays that reach our eyes appear to have come from a particular place – behind the mirror – whereas in fact they did not.  They reflected off the mirror.  Our eyes can only detect the fact that light has impinged upon them.  They cannot tell the direction from which the light came, and they certainly cannot discern the path it took along the way, like we can with a tennis ball for example.  We can only infer these things.  So when we look into a mirror, we see not light rays bouncing off its surface, but an entirely false Virtual image of ourselves standing behind it.  Which is very convenient when it comes to combing your hair.

In fact what you see in the mirror is an entire Virtual World – a reflection of you and everything else around you.  It is this Virtual World which has the apparent property of being inverted horizontally and not vertically.  To understand the image of the Virtual World, we need a good old-fashioned photographic slide, the kind you can put in a projector, or hold up to the light and squint at.  Those of you old enough to have loaded a stack of slides into a projector will know that getting them the right way up is easy – but getting them the right way round is a pain in the [somewhere inconvenient].  If you get it wrong, the slide will come out as a mirror image.  The Virtual World in the mirror is just like that old photographic slide.  The real image is oriented a certain way, but the virtual image is oriented differently.  In order to see the virtual image, we simply flip the picture slide over and look at it from the other side.

If instead of flipping it horizontally we flip the photographic slide vertically, what we will have is a top-to-bottom mirror-image of the original.  Left is on the left, and right is on the right, but top and bottom are inverted.  Now, by the simple expedient of rotating the image 180 degrees clockwise – not flipping it – thus bringing the bottom of the image to the top, we find that the resultant image is now the original left-to-right mirror-image.  You really need to try this for yourself sometime.  And that is the key observation here … viewed from the wrong side the same image can be a top-to-bottom OR a left-to-right mirror image of the original, depending only on how you look at it.  But not both.  And not neither.  We call this an image with “inverted parity”.

Looking at the Virtual World in the mirror is the exact same thing.  The Virtual You in the mirror lives in its virtual world, but, like the picture slide, we are in effect seeing it from behind, or in inverted parity, and therefore flipped side-to-side.  Or top-to-bottom, if we just lie down.

Apart from being able to comb your hair, this has consequences that you may not have thought of.  How many of you know someone – perhaps a wife – who complains about how she never looks good in pictures?  I know mine does.  As a result, their appearances in the family album are inevitably few and far between.  Most people have an asymmetric face.  The left half differs from the right half.  Occasionally the differences are subtle, but more often they are quite marked.  As an individual, for the most part, the image you recognize as being that of your face, is the one you see looking back at you from the mirror.  It is, of course, a “mirror image” of your real face.  Since your facial features are asymmetric, it is a different image from how everyone else in the world sees your face.  Everyone else only sees your face as it really is.  You only see the mirror image.  So when you see a photograph of yourself, suddenly your see it as everyone else sees it, but this is not how you are used to seeing yourself.  It is a mirror-image of what you have become accustomed to believing you look like.  And, quite often, it looks plain wrong.  As I write this, I suddenly recall a vivid memory of being a small child, and wondering why my mother always looked slightly odd whenever I saw her in the mirror!

I need to put this post to bed with a further observation.  The “mirror-image” nature of the image in the mirror is the consequence of light being reflected off the surface of the mirror.  Mathematically, the reflection off the mirror’s surface flips the parity of the virtual image.  This parity has two states, normal and inverted.  By reflecting it off the mirror’s surface, the parity of the virtual image flips to the inverted state.  Suppose we then reflect the light off a second surface.  This should flip the parity of the image back to normal again.  How might that work?

Here’s how we can test this.  We take two mirrors and join them together at exactly 90 degrees.  Hopefully, where the two mirrors meet will be as smooth a join as possible.  We now stand in front of the pair of mirrors, and gaze directly into the Vee of the join.  Light reflecting off the mirror will actually have two reflections, once off each surface of the compound mirror.  What will we see?

Once again, we will see ourselves in the mirror.  Except this time the image is not a “mirror-image”.  If I stick my arm out and point left, the fellow in the mirror sticks his opposite arm out and points right.  Indeed, he points to HIS left.  If I hold up a newspaper, the fellow in the mirror also holds up a newspaper and all the newsprint on it is normally aligned … and perfectly readable.  This is just like where we started off, with me and my identical twin standing face-to-face.  The only annoying thing is that there is a line that insists on interrupting the image and it insists on going right between the eyes of the fellow in the mirror.  What you see in this mirror is your face exactly as it looks to other people (OK, with an annoying line down the middle).  Or how it looks in photographs.  This is an example of a non-inverting mirror.  You will often encounter this effect in the elevators of high-end olde-worlde European hotels.

So why are non-inverting mirrors not at all popular?  Well, for a start, you might want to try combing your hair in one …

More from Issue 43

View All Articles in Issue 43

Search Copper Magazine

#234 A Life in High-End Audio: The Roy Hall Interview, Part One by Frank Doris Sep 07, 2026 #234 Jason Greenlaw Offers His Personal Perspective on Jazz Guitar in Vantage Point by Frank Doris Sep 07, 2026 #234 Transcendent Phoenix: Lucina Yue Brings the Ancient Konghou Into Modern Times by Frank Doris Sep 07, 2026 #234 We Must All Follow Our Bliss by B. Jan Montana Sep 07, 2026 #234 How to Play in a Rock Band, 27: Leveling Up by Frank Doris Sep 07, 2026 #234 Ross Valory: Traveling Into New Musical Territory With All of the Above by Ray Chelstowski Sep 07, 2026 #234 Singer/Songwriter John David Schrader: On the Need to Create by Joe Caplan Sep 07, 2026 #234 The People Who Make Audio Happen: More From T.H.E. Show SoCal 2026 by Harris Fogel Sep 07, 2026 #234 The Vinyl Beat Digs Into the Gadget Box by Rudy Radelic Sep 07, 2026 #234 The Rolling Stones: Foreign Tongues Spoken Loud by Wayne Robins Sep 07, 2026 #234 Musical Moments by Rich Isaacs Sep 07, 2026 #234 Rags for Solo Piano and a Dog: David Chesky's Ragtime Music for the Modern Age by Frankly Speaking Sep 07, 2026 #234 HIGH END 2026, Vienna: Here to Stay by Carsten Barnbeck Sep 07, 2026 #234 From The Audiophile’s Guide: The Two Main Types of Loudpeakers – Box and Panel by Paul McGowan Sep 07, 2026 #234 Letting it Slide by Frank Doris Sep 07, 2026 #234 PS Audio in the News by PS Audio Staff Sep 07, 2026 #234 Long Playing by Peter Xeni Sep 07, 2026 #234 La Mer by B. Jan Montana Sep 07, 2026 #233 A Report From The Total Hi-Fi Experience Show SoCal 2026 by B. Jan Montana Aug 03, 2026 #233 Bluegrass Meets Country, Folk, Jazz and More in All That We Carried by The Squid City Slingers by Frank Doris Aug 03, 2026 #233 Corey Glover and One Tribe Nation: A Variegated Musical Collective by Ray Chelstowski Aug 03, 2026 #233 Excursions with Clive: The Late Clive Davis, A Personal History by Wayne Robins Aug 03, 2026 #233 AI, Art, and Music: A Conversation With Synthography Art by Joe Caplan Aug 03, 2026 #233 New American Symphonies: A Rediscovered Gem and a Vital Contemporary Work by Frank Doris Aug 03, 2026 #233 The Vinyl Beat: Genesis, the Dave Clark Five, Antonio Carlos Jobim and More by Rudy Radelic Aug 03, 2026 #233 How to Play in a Rock Band, 26: When It's Time to Record Your Music by Frank Doris Aug 03, 2026 #233 More From T.H.E. Show 2026, and the People Who Made it Happen by Harris Fogel Aug 03, 2026 #233 Underappreciated Artists, Part Three: Icehouse by Rich Isaacs Aug 03, 2026 #233 The Surprisingly Rich and Varied Music of Somalia by Steve Kindig Aug 03, 2026 #233 A Remarkable Discographic Legacy: The LP Recordings of the Basel Symphony Orchestra by Stephan Haberthür Aug 03, 2026 #233 From The Audiophile’s Guide: The Importance of Loudspeakers by Paul McGowan Aug 03, 2026 #233 From Swimming Pool to New Listening Room: A Conversation with Norman Varney of AV RoomService by Gilles Laferrière Aug 03, 2026 #233 PS Audio in the News by PS Audio Staff Aug 03, 2026 #233 Audio Jewelry by Peter Xeni Aug 03, 2026 #233 Enrich Your Life by Frank Doris Aug 03, 2026 #233 The Searcher by James Schrimpf Aug 03, 2026 #232 What came first: Art or Music? A Conversation With Artist Jose Acosta by Joe Caplan Jul 06, 2026 #232 Blow By Blow: The Jeff Beck Story: An Insightful Book About a Guitar Icon by Ray Chelstowski Jul 06, 2026 #232 Creed Over Camaraderie? by B. Jan Montana Jul 06, 2026 #232 Chronicles of a Sound Pilgrim at the 2026 Montreal Audiofest by Hugues Morin Jul 06, 2026 #232 The Vinyl Beat: Summer Grooves by Rudy Radelic Jul 06, 2026 #232 Hibbing Hillbilly Dylan's Acoustic Rock by Wayne Robins Jul 06, 2026 #232 Quad Quads and Plasmatronics Tweeters: An Extraordinary System Comes to Life by Frank Doris Jul 06, 2026 #232 In Praise of Live Music, Once Again by Ted Shafran Jul 06, 2026 #232 Allnic Audio’s L-9000 Preamplifier: Design and Engineering Innovation by Howard Kneller Jul 06, 2026 #232 “Best Of” Lists and Rage Bait: Enough Already by Frank Doris Jul 06, 2026 #232 Quick Takes: Bud Shank, Paulo Almeida, Jakob Dreyer, Tim Eriksen and Peter Irvine by Frank Doris Jul 06, 2026

Of Mirrors, and Combs

Mirror, mirror, on the wall…

Here’s a quick challenge for you.  When you look at something in a mirror, why is the image always reversed left-to-right, and never top-to-bottom?  Think about that for a minute.  Always left-to-right.  But never top-to-bottom.

Now lie down on the floor in front of the mirror, with the mirror at your side.  Now the image is reversed top-to-bottom, but not left-to right.

Go read some of the other columns now, and come back to this when you think you have a watertight explanation.  And then read the answer below ….

… Who is The Fairest of Them All?

Suppose you and your identical twin stand face to face.  If I ask both of you to point left, each will point to a different side.  If I asked you both to point forwards, you would point at each other, again in opposite directions.  On the other hand, if I had asked both of you to point West, or North, you would both point in the same direction.  By stipulating Left/Right and Forward/Backward, I am stipulating a frame of reference which is different for both you and your twin.  Does this help?  No, not really.  But I will come back to it.

Consider, as someone once said to Bill Clinton, the optics of the problem.  What we see in the mirror is what we call a Virtual Image.  This means that the light rays that reach our eyes appear to have come from a particular place – behind the mirror – whereas in fact they did not.  They reflected off the mirror.  Our eyes can only detect the fact that light has impinged upon them.  They cannot tell the direction from which the light came, and they certainly cannot discern the path it took along the way, like we can with a tennis ball for example.  We can only infer these things.  So when we look into a mirror, we see not light rays bouncing off its surface, but an entirely false Virtual image of ourselves standing behind it.  Which is very convenient when it comes to combing your hair.

In fact what you see in the mirror is an entire Virtual World – a reflection of you and everything else around you.  It is this Virtual World which has the apparent property of being inverted horizontally and not vertically.  To understand the image of the Virtual World, we need a good old-fashioned photographic slide, the kind you can put in a projector, or hold up to the light and squint at.  Those of you old enough to have loaded a stack of slides into a projector will know that getting them the right way up is easy – but getting them the right way round is a pain in the [somewhere inconvenient].  If you get it wrong, the slide will come out as a mirror image.  The Virtual World in the mirror is just like that old photographic slide.  The real image is oriented a certain way, but the virtual image is oriented differently.  In order to see the virtual image, we simply flip the picture slide over and look at it from the other side.

If instead of flipping it horizontally we flip the photographic slide vertically, what we will have is a top-to-bottom mirror-image of the original.  Left is on the left, and right is on the right, but top and bottom are inverted.  Now, by the simple expedient of rotating the image 180 degrees clockwise – not flipping it – thus bringing the bottom of the image to the top, we find that the resultant image is now the original left-to-right mirror-image.  You really need to try this for yourself sometime.  And that is the key observation here … viewed from the wrong side the same image can be a top-to-bottom OR a left-to-right mirror image of the original, depending only on how you look at it.  But not both.  And not neither.  We call this an image with “inverted parity”.

Looking at the Virtual World in the mirror is the exact same thing.  The Virtual You in the mirror lives in its virtual world, but, like the picture slide, we are in effect seeing it from behind, or in inverted parity, and therefore flipped side-to-side.  Or top-to-bottom, if we just lie down.

Apart from being able to comb your hair, this has consequences that you may not have thought of.  How many of you know someone – perhaps a wife – who complains about how she never looks good in pictures?  I know mine does.  As a result, their appearances in the family album are inevitably few and far between.  Most people have an asymmetric face.  The left half differs from the right half.  Occasionally the differences are subtle, but more often they are quite marked.  As an individual, for the most part, the image you recognize as being that of your face, is the one you see looking back at you from the mirror.  It is, of course, a “mirror image” of your real face.  Since your facial features are asymmetric, it is a different image from how everyone else in the world sees your face.  Everyone else only sees your face as it really is.  You only see the mirror image.  So when you see a photograph of yourself, suddenly your see it as everyone else sees it, but this is not how you are used to seeing yourself.  It is a mirror-image of what you have become accustomed to believing you look like.  And, quite often, it looks plain wrong.  As I write this, I suddenly recall a vivid memory of being a small child, and wondering why my mother always looked slightly odd whenever I saw her in the mirror!

I need to put this post to bed with a further observation.  The “mirror-image” nature of the image in the mirror is the consequence of light being reflected off the surface of the mirror.  Mathematically, the reflection off the mirror’s surface flips the parity of the virtual image.  This parity has two states, normal and inverted.  By reflecting it off the mirror’s surface, the parity of the virtual image flips to the inverted state.  Suppose we then reflect the light off a second surface.  This should flip the parity of the image back to normal again.  How might that work?

Here’s how we can test this.  We take two mirrors and join them together at exactly 90 degrees.  Hopefully, where the two mirrors meet will be as smooth a join as possible.  We now stand in front of the pair of mirrors, and gaze directly into the Vee of the join.  Light reflecting off the mirror will actually have two reflections, once off each surface of the compound mirror.  What will we see?

Once again, we will see ourselves in the mirror.  Except this time the image is not a “mirror-image”.  If I stick my arm out and point left, the fellow in the mirror sticks his opposite arm out and points right.  Indeed, he points to HIS left.  If I hold up a newspaper, the fellow in the mirror also holds up a newspaper and all the newsprint on it is normally aligned … and perfectly readable.  This is just like where we started off, with me and my identical twin standing face-to-face.  The only annoying thing is that there is a line that insists on interrupting the image and it insists on going right between the eyes of the fellow in the mirror.  What you see in this mirror is your face exactly as it looks to other people (OK, with an annoying line down the middle).  Or how it looks in photographs.  This is an example of a non-inverting mirror.  You will often encounter this effect in the elevators of high-end olde-worlde European hotels.

So why are non-inverting mirrors not at all popular?  Well, for a start, you might want to try combing your hair in one …

0 comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments

Your avatar

Loading comments...

🗑️ Delete Comment

Enter moderator password to delete this comment:

✏️ Edit Comment

Enter your email to verify ownership: