COPPER

A PS Audio Publication

Issue 206 • Free Online Magazine

Issue 206 Audio Anthropology

Test Records and Demo Discs, Part Two

Test Records and Demo Discs, Part Two

In the days before digital music, the primary medium for sound reproduction was vinyl records. Sure, there were some who preferred reel-to-reel tapes, but they were in the minority. The turntable was king, and it had to be properly set up. Any audiophile worth his (or her) salt owned at least one or two test records specifically designed for that task.

Over the years, I’ve collected a disproportionate number of such discs (it helped that I worked in record stores for much of my adult life, so I could obtain the ones I wanted at reasonable prices).

In the first part of this series (in Issue 205), the focus was on test records issued by record labels themselves. In this installment, albums from equipment manufacturers are featured. It’s only logical that phono cartridge makers would produce test records to show off their products. Among the biggest names in the 1960s and 1970s were ADC, Empire, Grado, Micro-Acoustics, Ortofon, Pickering, Shure, and Stanton. I have owned cartridges from half of those companies.

ADC (Audio Dynamics Corporation) was known for their XLM and ZLM series cartridges, which were optimized for low-mass tonearms. ADC cartridges used an “induced magnet” design not unlike those from Grado. They had excellent detail when used with the right equipment. Although you can still find listings online for them, the company is no longer in business. They did produce a test record, but I haven’t got one.

Empire produced more than just cartridges – their Troubador line of turntables (with arms) set a standard for performance and elegance (they were massive units finished with a golden hue), and their Grenadier line of two- and three-way column speakers were designed to look like round or hexagonal end tables with marble tops. Those products are worth Googling if only to see their design. I could not find any evidence of an Empire test record.

Grado cartridges use the moving-iron principle in their design and are held in high regard. However, due to reports of hum problems when used with a Linn turntable (my analog source), I have never tried one. (Editor Frank Doris said he used various Grados with a Linn/Syrinx arm combination in the 1980s and never had a problem.) I don’t believe they produced a test record either.

Micro-Acoustics used a unique electret system (as opposed to moving-magnet or moving-coil) for generating the signal from the stylus. The units contained a passive solid-state circuit coupled to the electret generator. I owned a Micro-Acoustics 2002 cartridge in the late 1970s and can attest to its superb transient response. The company also manufactured cutting styli for mastering lathes.

  

 

Micro-Acoustics TT 2002 Demonstration Record (1976)

This one tests for transient and tracking ability because, as they say on the cover, “good tracking isn’t enough.” The first side contains tracks with both musical and computer-generated tones. The second side features musical selections intended to show your cartridge’s performance in both areas. There is quite a bit of information provided on the back cover.

 

Ortofon is one of the oldest and most respected names in phonographic reproduction equipment. They currently produce cartridges with a cost ranging from under $100 to over $10,000! I owned an Ortofon cartridge (can’t recall the model) maybe 40 years ago. They currently offer a test record, but at $50 or so, I have resisted purchasing one.

Pickering was a pretty big name in cartridges when I was starting out in hi-fi 50 years ago, but at one time, they made more than cartridges. My dad had a mono system from around 1950 consisting of a Garrard turntable (not the sought-after 301, darn it), a Bogen tube (integrated) amp, and a single floorstanding Pickering 180L speaker that measured 48" H x 10" W x 10" D. It was a folded-horn, variable-port design in which he had placed a newer 8-inch Wharfedale driver. While in high school, I was at a local Radio Shack store and noticed a matching speaker priced at $15 in the back room. The serial number was within ten units of my father’s speaker! I snatched it up and had my first stereo pair of speakers (albeit with mismatched drivers). I never owned a Pickering cartridge, nor am I aware of any test records under their name.

 

 

Rich's Pickering 180L speakers.

 

 

 

 

Shure Audio Obstacle Course Records (1967, 1973, 1982)

Shure was probably the biggest name in phono cartridges well into the 1980s. They also were famous for their microphones (and headphones). Shure’s point of focus with cartridges was on trackability, and their products performed admirably in that area (as well as others).

The trackability tests on their albums involved recordings of various solo instruments (e.g., orchestral bells, bass drum, etc.) at four increasing levels. A chart was provided on the insert where you could enter the levels at which your cartridge began to mis-track (if at all).

For me, the best thing on these records was the phasing test. Before Shure’s records, the phasing test on most test records used bass tones recorded in phase. You were required to listen to the tones, then switch the positive and negative leads to one speaker and listen again. Whichever configuration resulted in stronger bass was the correct one. What a pain! Instead, the Shure records presented a recording of a man speaking the words, “My voice is recorded in phase, and should appear between the two speakers. My voice is now recorded out of phase, and should have a diffuse and directionless quality – it should not appear between the two speakers on a correctly phased system. If opposite results are obtained, the system is out of phase.” This was brilliant. You could even record that track on a cassette and test your car stereo – or any other system lacking a turntable – without having to change connections.

With each iteration of the V15 cartridge, a new Obstacle Course record was issued. Along the way, Shure also made test records that were not intended for the consumer market. These featured sine waves at various frequencies and were designed for use in conjunction with an oscilloscope.

The next installments in this series will feature test and demo records issued by other stereo equipment manufacturers, labels, and publications.

More from Issue 206

View All Articles in Issue 206

Past Issues

225 issues and counting

View All Past Issues

Search Copper Magazine

#225 Capital Audiofest 2025: Must-See Stereo, Part One by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Otis Taylor and the Electrics Delivers a Powerful Set of Hypnotic Modern Blues by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 A Christmas Miracle by B. Jan Montana Dec 01, 2025 #225 T.H.E. Show New York 2025, Part Two: Plenty to See, Hear, and Enjoy by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Underappreciated Artists, Part One: Martin Briley by Rich Isaacs Dec 01, 2025 #225 Rock and Roll is Here to Stay by Wayne Robins Dec 01, 2025 #225 A Lifetime of Holiday Record (and CD) Listening by Rudy Radelic Dec 01, 2025 #225 Little Feat: Not Saying Goodbye, Not Yet by Ray Chelstowski Dec 01, 2025 #225 How to Play in a Rock Band, Part 18: Dealing With Burnout by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 The People Who Make Audio Happen: CanJam SoCal 2025 by Harris Fogel Dec 01, 2025 #225 Chicago’s Sonic Sanctuaries: Four Hi‑Fi Listening Bars Channeling the Jazz‑Kissa Spirit by Olivier Meunier-Plante Dec 01, 2025 #225 From The Audiophile’s Guide: Controlling Bass Frequencies Through Membrane Absorbers (and How to Build Your Own) by Paul McGowan Dec 01, 2025 #225 Your Editor’s Tips for Attending Audio Shows by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 PS Audio in the News by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Back to My Reel-to-Reel Roots, Part 24 by Ken Kessler Dec 01, 2025 #225 Holiday Music by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Puppy Prognostication by Peter Xeni Dec 01, 2025 #225 How to Post Comments on Copper by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Living Color by Rudy Radelic Dec 01, 2025 #224 T.H.E. Show New York 2025, Part One: A New Beginning by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 Fool’s Leap of Faith is the Extraordinary Octave Records Debut from Singer/Songwriter Tyler Burba and Visit by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 The Beatles’ “Aeolian Cadences.” What? by Wayne Robins Nov 03, 2025 #224 Persona Non Grata by B. Jan Montana Nov 03, 2025 #224 Talking With Recording Engineer Barry Diament of Soundkeeper Recordings, Part Two by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 B Sides, B Movies, and Beware of Zombies by Rudy Radelic Nov 03, 2025 #224 The Burn-In Chronicles: 1,000 Hours to Sonic Salvation by Olivier Meunier-Plante Nov 03, 2025 #224 A Conversation With Mat Weisfeld of VPI Industries by Joe Caplan Nov 03, 2025 #224 Blues-Rocker Kenny Wayne Shepherd Celebrates 30 Years of Ledbetter Heights by Ray Chelstowski Nov 03, 2025 #224 Playing in a Rock Band, 17: When Good Gigs Go Bad, Part Two by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 From The Audiophile’s Guide: Dealing with Odd-Shaped Rooms by Paul McGowan Nov 03, 2025 #224 TEAC’s TN-3B-SE Turntable Plays Bob Dylan by Howard Kneller Nov 03, 2025 #224 PS Audio in the News by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 Lost in Translation by Peter Xeni Nov 03, 2025 #224 Reel-to-Reel Roots, Part 23: Better Than Rice Krispies by Ken Kessler Nov 03, 2025 #224 I Bring Joy! by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #224 Screen Test by Rich Isaacs Nov 03, 2025 #224 How to Post Comments on Copper by Frank Doris Nov 03, 2025 #132 Dr. Patrick Gleeson: The Interview, Part Two by Rich Isaacs Oct 07, 2025 #223 World Fusion Meets Flamenco in Gratitude from Steve Mullins and Rim of the Well by Frank Doris Oct 06, 2025 #223 Judging Albums by Their Covers by Rich Isaacs Oct 06, 2025 #223 Recent Arrivals and 12-inch Royalty by Rudy Radelic Oct 06, 2025 #223 Summer of Creem, Part Two by Wayne Robins Oct 06, 2025 #223 Recording Engineer Barry Diament of Soundkeeper Recordings: Striving for Natural Sound by Frank Doris Oct 06, 2025 #223 Tea on the Terrace by B. Jan Montana Oct 06, 2025 #223 How Good Can Car Audio Get? by Joe Caplan Oct 06, 2025 #223 The Advantages of a Dedicated Listening Room by Paul McGowan Oct 06, 2025 #223 1! 2! 3! 4! Surrounded by the Ramones in Dolby Atmos! by Frank Doris Oct 06, 2025

Test Records and Demo Discs, Part Two

Test Records and Demo Discs, Part Two

In the days before digital music, the primary medium for sound reproduction was vinyl records. Sure, there were some who preferred reel-to-reel tapes, but they were in the minority. The turntable was king, and it had to be properly set up. Any audiophile worth his (or her) salt owned at least one or two test records specifically designed for that task.

Over the years, I’ve collected a disproportionate number of such discs (it helped that I worked in record stores for much of my adult life, so I could obtain the ones I wanted at reasonable prices).

In the first part of this series (in Issue 205), the focus was on test records issued by record labels themselves. In this installment, albums from equipment manufacturers are featured. It’s only logical that phono cartridge makers would produce test records to show off their products. Among the biggest names in the 1960s and 1970s were ADC, Empire, Grado, Micro-Acoustics, Ortofon, Pickering, Shure, and Stanton. I have owned cartridges from half of those companies.

ADC (Audio Dynamics Corporation) was known for their XLM and ZLM series cartridges, which were optimized for low-mass tonearms. ADC cartridges used an “induced magnet” design not unlike those from Grado. They had excellent detail when used with the right equipment. Although you can still find listings online for them, the company is no longer in business. They did produce a test record, but I haven’t got one.

Empire produced more than just cartridges – their Troubador line of turntables (with arms) set a standard for performance and elegance (they were massive units finished with a golden hue), and their Grenadier line of two- and three-way column speakers were designed to look like round or hexagonal end tables with marble tops. Those products are worth Googling if only to see their design. I could not find any evidence of an Empire test record.

Grado cartridges use the moving-iron principle in their design and are held in high regard. However, due to reports of hum problems when used with a Linn turntable (my analog source), I have never tried one. (Editor Frank Doris said he used various Grados with a Linn/Syrinx arm combination in the 1980s and never had a problem.) I don’t believe they produced a test record either.

Micro-Acoustics used a unique electret system (as opposed to moving-magnet or moving-coil) for generating the signal from the stylus. The units contained a passive solid-state circuit coupled to the electret generator. I owned a Micro-Acoustics 2002 cartridge in the late 1970s and can attest to its superb transient response. The company also manufactured cutting styli for mastering lathes.

  

 

Micro-Acoustics TT 2002 Demonstration Record (1976)

This one tests for transient and tracking ability because, as they say on the cover, “good tracking isn’t enough.” The first side contains tracks with both musical and computer-generated tones. The second side features musical selections intended to show your cartridge’s performance in both areas. There is quite a bit of information provided on the back cover.

 

Ortofon is one of the oldest and most respected names in phonographic reproduction equipment. They currently produce cartridges with a cost ranging from under $100 to over $10,000! I owned an Ortofon cartridge (can’t recall the model) maybe 40 years ago. They currently offer a test record, but at $50 or so, I have resisted purchasing one.

Pickering was a pretty big name in cartridges when I was starting out in hi-fi 50 years ago, but at one time, they made more than cartridges. My dad had a mono system from around 1950 consisting of a Garrard turntable (not the sought-after 301, darn it), a Bogen tube (integrated) amp, and a single floorstanding Pickering 180L speaker that measured 48" H x 10" W x 10" D. It was a folded-horn, variable-port design in which he had placed a newer 8-inch Wharfedale driver. While in high school, I was at a local Radio Shack store and noticed a matching speaker priced at $15 in the back room. The serial number was within ten units of my father’s speaker! I snatched it up and had my first stereo pair of speakers (albeit with mismatched drivers). I never owned a Pickering cartridge, nor am I aware of any test records under their name.

 

 

Rich's Pickering 180L speakers.

 

 

 

 

Shure Audio Obstacle Course Records (1967, 1973, 1982)

Shure was probably the biggest name in phono cartridges well into the 1980s. They also were famous for their microphones (and headphones). Shure’s point of focus with cartridges was on trackability, and their products performed admirably in that area (as well as others).

The trackability tests on their albums involved recordings of various solo instruments (e.g., orchestral bells, bass drum, etc.) at four increasing levels. A chart was provided on the insert where you could enter the levels at which your cartridge began to mis-track (if at all).

For me, the best thing on these records was the phasing test. Before Shure’s records, the phasing test on most test records used bass tones recorded in phase. You were required to listen to the tones, then switch the positive and negative leads to one speaker and listen again. Whichever configuration resulted in stronger bass was the correct one. What a pain! Instead, the Shure records presented a recording of a man speaking the words, “My voice is recorded in phase, and should appear between the two speakers. My voice is now recorded out of phase, and should have a diffuse and directionless quality – it should not appear between the two speakers on a correctly phased system. If opposite results are obtained, the system is out of phase.” This was brilliant. You could even record that track on a cassette and test your car stereo – or any other system lacking a turntable – without having to change connections.

With each iteration of the V15 cartridge, a new Obstacle Course record was issued. Along the way, Shure also made test records that were not intended for the consumer market. These featured sine waves at various frequencies and were designed for use in conjunction with an oscilloscope.

The next installments in this series will feature test and demo records issued by other stereo equipment manufacturers, labels, and publications.

0 comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments

Your avatar

Loading comments...

🗑️ Delete Comment

Enter moderator password to delete this comment: