Skill vs. tools

Prev Next

Skill vs. tools

It is always difficult to have to reject the hard work of anyone but, in the long run, it's critical to maintain standards.

While auditioning a candidate recording we made of a wonderful musician for Octave, I had the unfortunate task of saying no. No, it's not good enough. No, it serves neither the music nor the audience: instruments—especially the drumkit—sounded dull, lifeless, and blurry.

Of course, being rejected often raises one's defenses:

"It was the best that could be done with what I had to work with."

Two days later I had the exact opposite reaction to a new recording candidate from a different engineer.

"Holy crap!" I said, "This is the best I have ever heard a drumkit."

Cymbals shimmered and dripped with realism. The snap of the snare was as visceral and lifelike as I had ever heard. The old Sheffield Direct to Discs sounded like an MP3 in comparison (ok, I get excited as I recall the experience and I am prone to exaggeration).

Without exaggeration, however, I feel confident in sharing that it felt like the FR30s broke out in a smile.

But, here's the thing. Same drumkit, same recording space, same equipment between the two recordings. Different drummer, to be sure, but that wasn't what I was hearing. No, what I was hearing was a perfect example of raw skill.

Like the difference between Horowitz and a student playing the piano, or Ansel Adams and me shooting a picture.

I know there are some old sayings about arrows and braves, guns and gunners, and a distant memory of a high-school profanity example too.

However it works for you, I trust you get the point.

When it comes down to skill or tools, skill wins every time.

Back to blog
Paul McGowan

Founder & CEO

Never miss a post


Related Posts

1 of 2