COPPER

A PS Audio Publication

Issue 205 • Free Online Magazine

Issue 205 Paul's Place

One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Paul McGowan’s Favorite Microphones and Their Uses

One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Paul McGowan’s Favorite Microphones and Their Uses

When it comes to high-end audio, we can all agree that there's a huge obsession with which pieces of gear sound the way we hope for. Some of us prefer the warmth of tubes, while others like the openness and clarity of solid-state. Or, there’s digital versus analog. And, don't get me going about loudspeakers, where we're talking about night and day differences in sound: electrostats versus dynamics, open baffle versus closed box, planars and ribbons versus cones and domes.

In the recording arts we see the same divisions and strong opinions, but not so much for electronics and speakers as for microphone choices. And microphones are all over the map. Ribbons versus condensers and dynamics, phantom-powered, FET or vacuum-tube-amplified, capsule types, and the list goes on forever.

We here at PS Audio and Octave Records have our favorites for each application. For blaring horns, we like the warmth and dynamics of ribbons. For the delicate overtones and speed of string plucks we prefer large-capsule condensers. To capture the snap and crazy dynamics of a snare drum, we turn to dynamics.

The lists of microphones and the opinions of recording engineers are endless.

Sound familiar?

When we first started Octave Records we invested heavily in microphones (and they, like high-end audio, are expensive). We acquired the classic Neumanns, Sennheisers, AKGs, Telefunkens and so on. And then we played with them for endless hours as we learned to assign the best microphone to the best applications.

Over time, winners began to emerge – our go-to favorites.

Over the course of this article, I'll wax on about a few of the ones that matter to me the most. Had I the time, it'd be fun to compare them side by side and let you hear the differences, and maybe at some point I'll get off my keister and actually do that.

This would not be an easy task, because when we are in the studio we are chewing through a musician's time and energy to make a recording. Adding layers of microphones to experiment with would only get in the way. My hope is that at some point we might find a willing musician with time on their hands and a willingness to participate, but most of them have lives and gigs to go to. Studio time is used to make their music, not keep us audiophiles happy with our experiments.

 

Neumann

The sound of Neumann microphones is way more open, airy, and transient-rich than any dynamic transducer. I cannot imagine a recording studio worth its salt that doesn't have at least a few of the classic Neumanns at the ready.

And while Neumann was the company that introduced the condenser mic (there were others too, but Neumann is credited with bringing them to market in a big way) it wasn't until a year after my birth that they rose to stardom as a brand.

Their leap to fame occurred in 1949 with the introduction of the U 47. It was the first microphone to offer a switchable polar pattern (omnidirectional or cardioid), and its warm, clear sound made it a favorite among recording engineers and artists alike. The U 47 was famously used by the Beatles, Frank Sinatra, and countless other musicians, securing its place in recording history.

In the 1950s, Neumann continued to innovate with the development of the M 49 and U 67 microphones, which introduced new levels of versatility and fidelity. The U 67, in particular, became renowned for its smooth sound and flexibility, making it a staple in studios around the world.

The 1960s saw the advent of the Neumann KM 84, the first microphone to utilize 48-volt phantom power, and later, the U 87, a standard that is still in use today. The phantom power supply innovation eliminated the need for external power supplies and made microphone setup simpler and more efficient.

So much for history. Now, let's dive into today's use.

When we started Octave Records we of course had to have available to us all the classics that were regarded so highly. So, we acquired Neuman U 47s, 67s, and 87s and began to learn their characteristics.

All three are great microphones, but we soon found ourselves returning again and again to one in particular. The U 67. This microphone captured, like no other we have ever used, the transient and harmonic information of instruments. From woodwinds, to guitars, to cymbals, nothing even comes close to the sound of the U 67.

 

 

A Neumann U 67 microphone with power supply.

 

Which got me curious. Why? Was it the diaphragm? Each of the three uses the same "planar" type diaphragm I earlier described, so it might be that but…

A closer look shows me something really revealing: the built-in amplification system. In both the earlier U 47 and 87, FETs are used, while in the U 67, a vacuum tube is employed.

This, in my opinion, is one of the biggest reasons this microphone kills every other microphone we have in stock (for these applications). 

Does that mean that vacuum-tube microphones are always better? No. We also have a collection of vacuum-tube condenser microphone knock offs to the Neumann and none even approach its sound.

Just like hi-fi, it is the artful blend of all the innards that make the magic.

 

Telefunken

Telefunken is another German stalwart.

Telefunken was a German electronics company founded in Berlin in 1903. Originally named Telefunken Gesellschaft für drahtlose Telegraphie m.b.H., the company played a significant role in the development of radio and broadcasting technology. Before World War II, Telefunken was a big consumer brands company making televisions, radios, and of course, microphones.

In the 1960s, Telefunken merged with AEG (Allgemeine Elektricitäts-Gesellschaft), another prominent German electronics company, to form the conglomerate AEG-Telefunken which, sadly, is no longer with us today. 

The microphone I am so in love with is a stereo microphone. The Telefunken AR-70 is a legendary microphone manufactured by the company in the 1950s.

It is a stereo microphone with two large-diaphragm condenser capsules mounted in an adjustable 90-degree X/Y stereo configuration. This design allows for phase-perfect stereo recording without the need for multiple microphones.

 


The Telefunken AR-70 stereo tube microphone.

 

Most important to me is its ability to accurately and easily handle the Blumlein microphone technique, named after the inventor of stereo, Alan Blumlein.

Born on June 29, 1903 in London, England, Alan Blumlein's journey into the world of engineering led him to his groundbreaking invention: stereo sound recording, a concept that revolutionized the way we perceive audio. In the early 1930s, he introduced the "Blumlein Pair" microphone configuration. This setup features two microphones that have a bi-directional or “figure eight” pickup pattern, with the mics positioned 90 degrees from each other.

In my experience, the two best microphones that employ the Blumlein technique are the AKG C24, and the Telefunken AR-70. Octave Studios owns both, but my preference is the Telefunken. Its warmth, accuracy, and richness are unmatched by any other stereo microphone I have ever used.

The AR-70 is my favorite microphone for capturing the beautiful tones of Octave Records’ Steinway grand piano. Never heard anything come even close. 

The only downside to it is also its upside. It captures everything from the piano -- and also the room it is being played in. This is great for a piano recording, but not so great if in the same room there are other instruments like drums being played. Then, I have to resort to another microphone, a Gefell.

 

Gefell

You may have noticed that in my look at the microphones we use at Octave Records, the two I've focused on first are both German. In fact, Germany makes some of the best microphones in the world. Today's post is about another German microphone, one that is not so expensive and yet is an amazing-sounding transducer:

The Gefell M 930.

As noted, the German company Neumann makes my favorite overall microphone: the U 67. Born out of the creative genius of Georg Neumann, the company began in 1928, and quickly became synonymous with great microphones.

The rise of Neumann as a company was not a walk in the park. Not after what happened to Germany after World War II. In the tumultuous years following the war, the division of Germany left the Neumann company split between East and West. In East Germany, the company continued under the name Microtech Gefell, founded by Georg Neumann's former employee and childhood friend, Dr. Erich Kuehne.

Which brings us to the Gefell M 930 large diaphragm microphone – designed, crafted, and built with the same philosophies as the Neumann large-capsule U series.

 

 

A Gefell M 930 cardioid condenser microphone.

 

The Gefell M 930 is renowned for its warm, natural sound, and low cost. Where a modern U 67 vacuum-tube microphone can be purchased for about $8,000, and a vintage U 67 for $30,000, the FET-based Gefells can be bought today for about $1,200 each.

These are amazing FET microphones that sound far better than Neumann FET versions. In fact, in side-by-side comparisons on captures of instruments ranging from woodwinds to pianos, the M930 sonically outperforms the Neumann FET-based U 87 all day long.

Sometimes, lower-cost and better-engineered products can beat their brethren. All it takes to find them is a good set of ears and an open mind.

 

Header image courtesy of Pexels.com/Amin Asbaghipour.

This article is based on a series of Paul’s Posts from March 2024.

More from Issue 205

View All Articles in Issue 205

Search Copper Magazine

#231 Piano Prodigy Jude Kofie Releases His Debut Album On Octave Records by Frank Doris Jun 01, 2026 #231 Underappreciated Artists, Part Two: City Boy by Rich Isaacs Jun 01, 2026 #231 Music and the Art of Creation: Talking With Saxophonist Rob Scheps by Joe Caplan Jun 01, 2026 #231 How to Play in a Rock Band, 24: Further Adventures at the 2026 Montauk Music Festival by Frank Doris Jun 01, 2026 #231 Courtney Barnett: Creature of Habit by Wayne Robins Jun 01, 2026 #231 Angine de Poitrine: Interstellar Guitar Rock Saviors Headed for Late-Night TV Pop Stardom? by Mark Lepage Jun 01, 2026 #231 Impressions of AXPONA 2026, Part One by Frank Doris Jun 01, 2026 #231 2026 La Jolla Concours d'Elegance: Another Aesthetic Feast by B. Jan Montana Jun 01, 2026 #231 Country Music Icon Jo Dee Messina’s Bridges: A New Beginning by Ray Chelstowski Jun 01, 2026 #231 The Luxury Dispatch Hosts a Video Podcast With Ken Kessler by Ken Kessler Jun 01, 2026 #231 The Vinyl Beat: Tracking in the Motor City by Rudy Radelic Jun 01, 2026 #231 Lots of Fun With DSP: The Ferrum Audio WANDLA DAC and Its Tube Mode by Frank Doris Jun 01, 2026 #231 From The Audiophile's Guide: Digital Source Components and Streaming Audio by Paul McGowan Jun 01, 2026 #231 Onkyo’s Monster M-510 power amplifier by The Staff at Just Audio Jun 01, 2026 #231 PS Audio in the News by PS Audio Staff Jun 01, 2026 #231 Naming Convention by Peter Xeni Jun 01, 2026 #231 Les Invisibles by Frank Doris Jun 01, 2026 #231 Wildlife Scene by James Schrimpf Jun 01, 2026 #230 Camaraderie by B. Jan Montana May 04, 2026 #230 AXPONA 2026: A Family Gathering by Paul McGowan May 04, 2026 #230 Pianist Ryan Benthall Explores Jazz Realms and Far Beyond With Divine Sky by Frank Doris May 04, 2026 #230 The Vinyl Beat in AXPONA-Land by Rudy Radelic May 04, 2026 #230 Teddy Thompson’s Musical Growth Deepens With Never Be the Same by Ray Chelstowski May 04, 2026 #230 More Fun in the Sun: Florida Audio Expo, Part Two by Frank Doris May 04, 2026 #230 CanJam NYC 2026 Show Report: Heady Sound, Part Two by Frank Doris and Harris Fogel May 04, 2026 #230 Sonic Youth On Murray Street by Wayne Robins May 04, 2026 #230 Graffeo Coffee: A Symphony of Sensory Experience by Joe Caplan May 04, 2026 #230 The Saul Authority: The Story of Hi-Fi Pioneer Saul Marantz by Olivier Meunier-Plante May 04, 2026 #230 How to Play in a Rock Band, 23: Encounters With Famous Musicians, Part Two by Frank Doris May 04, 2026 #230 An Outlier in the Rack: A Vintage BIC Beam Box by The Staff at Just Audio May 04, 2026 #230 PS Audio in the News by PS Audio Staff May 04, 2026 #230 A Cautionary Tale by Rich Isaacs May 04, 2026 #230 Reel-to-Reel Roots, Part 33 (Revised): Ken Kessler Reports On the 2026 (British) AudioJumble by Ken Kessler May 04, 2026 #230 Text Messaging by Frank Doris May 04, 2026 #230 The Audiophile Rat Race by Peter Xeni May 04, 2026 #230 On the Rocks by Rich Isaacs May 04, 2026 #229 The Earliest Stars of Country Music, Part Three by Jeff Weiner Apr 06, 2026 #229 The Healing Power of Music and Sound at the Omega Institute by Joe Caplan Apr 06, 2026 #229 CanJam NYC 2026 Show Report: Heady Sound, Part One by Frank Doris Apr 06, 2026 #229 Florida Audio Expo 2026: Warming Up to High-End Audio, Part One by Frank Doris Apr 06, 2026 #229 Quick Takes: Anne Bisson, Sam Morrison, The Velvet Underground, and the Stooges by Frank Doris Apr 06, 2026 #229 The Vinyl Beat: New Arrivals, and Old Audio Show Demo Scores to Settle by Rudy Radelic Apr 06, 2026 #229 Harvard Gets a High-End Audio Education by Frank Doris Apr 06, 2026 #229 No Country for Old Knees by B. Jan Montana Apr 06, 2026 #229 How To Play in A Rock Band, 22: Encounters With Famous Musicians, Part 1 by Frank Doris Apr 06, 2026 #229 The Soulful Grooves of Guinea-Bissau by Steve Kindig Apr 06, 2026 #229 Four-Hand Piano Performance at Its Finest by Stephan Haberthür Apr 06, 2026

One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Paul McGowan’s Favorite Microphones and Their Uses

One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Paul McGowan’s Favorite Microphones and Their Uses

When it comes to high-end audio, we can all agree that there's a huge obsession with which pieces of gear sound the way we hope for. Some of us prefer the warmth of tubes, while others like the openness and clarity of solid-state. Or, there’s digital versus analog. And, don't get me going about loudspeakers, where we're talking about night and day differences in sound: electrostats versus dynamics, open baffle versus closed box, planars and ribbons versus cones and domes.

In the recording arts we see the same divisions and strong opinions, but not so much for electronics and speakers as for microphone choices. And microphones are all over the map. Ribbons versus condensers and dynamics, phantom-powered, FET or vacuum-tube-amplified, capsule types, and the list goes on forever.

We here at PS Audio and Octave Records have our favorites for each application. For blaring horns, we like the warmth and dynamics of ribbons. For the delicate overtones and speed of string plucks we prefer large-capsule condensers. To capture the snap and crazy dynamics of a snare drum, we turn to dynamics.

The lists of microphones and the opinions of recording engineers are endless.

Sound familiar?

When we first started Octave Records we invested heavily in microphones (and they, like high-end audio, are expensive). We acquired the classic Neumanns, Sennheisers, AKGs, Telefunkens and so on. And then we played with them for endless hours as we learned to assign the best microphone to the best applications.

Over time, winners began to emerge – our go-to favorites.

Over the course of this article, I'll wax on about a few of the ones that matter to me the most. Had I the time, it'd be fun to compare them side by side and let you hear the differences, and maybe at some point I'll get off my keister and actually do that.

This would not be an easy task, because when we are in the studio we are chewing through a musician's time and energy to make a recording. Adding layers of microphones to experiment with would only get in the way. My hope is that at some point we might find a willing musician with time on their hands and a willingness to participate, but most of them have lives and gigs to go to. Studio time is used to make their music, not keep us audiophiles happy with our experiments.

 

Neumann

The sound of Neumann microphones is way more open, airy, and transient-rich than any dynamic transducer. I cannot imagine a recording studio worth its salt that doesn't have at least a few of the classic Neumanns at the ready.

And while Neumann was the company that introduced the condenser mic (there were others too, but Neumann is credited with bringing them to market in a big way) it wasn't until a year after my birth that they rose to stardom as a brand.

Their leap to fame occurred in 1949 with the introduction of the U 47. It was the first microphone to offer a switchable polar pattern (omnidirectional or cardioid), and its warm, clear sound made it a favorite among recording engineers and artists alike. The U 47 was famously used by the Beatles, Frank Sinatra, and countless other musicians, securing its place in recording history.

In the 1950s, Neumann continued to innovate with the development of the M 49 and U 67 microphones, which introduced new levels of versatility and fidelity. The U 67, in particular, became renowned for its smooth sound and flexibility, making it a staple in studios around the world.

The 1960s saw the advent of the Neumann KM 84, the first microphone to utilize 48-volt phantom power, and later, the U 87, a standard that is still in use today. The phantom power supply innovation eliminated the need for external power supplies and made microphone setup simpler and more efficient.

So much for history. Now, let's dive into today's use.

When we started Octave Records we of course had to have available to us all the classics that were regarded so highly. So, we acquired Neuman U 47s, 67s, and 87s and began to learn their characteristics.

All three are great microphones, but we soon found ourselves returning again and again to one in particular. The U 67. This microphone captured, like no other we have ever used, the transient and harmonic information of instruments. From woodwinds, to guitars, to cymbals, nothing even comes close to the sound of the U 67.

 

 

A Neumann U 67 microphone with power supply.

 

Which got me curious. Why? Was it the diaphragm? Each of the three uses the same "planar" type diaphragm I earlier described, so it might be that but…

A closer look shows me something really revealing: the built-in amplification system. In both the earlier U 47 and 87, FETs are used, while in the U 67, a vacuum tube is employed.

This, in my opinion, is one of the biggest reasons this microphone kills every other microphone we have in stock (for these applications). 

Does that mean that vacuum-tube microphones are always better? No. We also have a collection of vacuum-tube condenser microphone knock offs to the Neumann and none even approach its sound.

Just like hi-fi, it is the artful blend of all the innards that make the magic.

 

Telefunken

Telefunken is another German stalwart.

Telefunken was a German electronics company founded in Berlin in 1903. Originally named Telefunken Gesellschaft für drahtlose Telegraphie m.b.H., the company played a significant role in the development of radio and broadcasting technology. Before World War II, Telefunken was a big consumer brands company making televisions, radios, and of course, microphones.

In the 1960s, Telefunken merged with AEG (Allgemeine Elektricitäts-Gesellschaft), another prominent German electronics company, to form the conglomerate AEG-Telefunken which, sadly, is no longer with us today. 

The microphone I am so in love with is a stereo microphone. The Telefunken AR-70 is a legendary microphone manufactured by the company in the 1950s.

It is a stereo microphone with two large-diaphragm condenser capsules mounted in an adjustable 90-degree X/Y stereo configuration. This design allows for phase-perfect stereo recording without the need for multiple microphones.

 


The Telefunken AR-70 stereo tube microphone.

 

Most important to me is its ability to accurately and easily handle the Blumlein microphone technique, named after the inventor of stereo, Alan Blumlein.

Born on June 29, 1903 in London, England, Alan Blumlein's journey into the world of engineering led him to his groundbreaking invention: stereo sound recording, a concept that revolutionized the way we perceive audio. In the early 1930s, he introduced the "Blumlein Pair" microphone configuration. This setup features two microphones that have a bi-directional or “figure eight” pickup pattern, with the mics positioned 90 degrees from each other.

In my experience, the two best microphones that employ the Blumlein technique are the AKG C24, and the Telefunken AR-70. Octave Studios owns both, but my preference is the Telefunken. Its warmth, accuracy, and richness are unmatched by any other stereo microphone I have ever used.

The AR-70 is my favorite microphone for capturing the beautiful tones of Octave Records’ Steinway grand piano. Never heard anything come even close. 

The only downside to it is also its upside. It captures everything from the piano -- and also the room it is being played in. This is great for a piano recording, but not so great if in the same room there are other instruments like drums being played. Then, I have to resort to another microphone, a Gefell.

 

Gefell

You may have noticed that in my look at the microphones we use at Octave Records, the two I've focused on first are both German. In fact, Germany makes some of the best microphones in the world. Today's post is about another German microphone, one that is not so expensive and yet is an amazing-sounding transducer:

The Gefell M 930.

As noted, the German company Neumann makes my favorite overall microphone: the U 67. Born out of the creative genius of Georg Neumann, the company began in 1928, and quickly became synonymous with great microphones.

The rise of Neumann as a company was not a walk in the park. Not after what happened to Germany after World War II. In the tumultuous years following the war, the division of Germany left the Neumann company split between East and West. In East Germany, the company continued under the name Microtech Gefell, founded by Georg Neumann's former employee and childhood friend, Dr. Erich Kuehne.

Which brings us to the Gefell M 930 large diaphragm microphone – designed, crafted, and built with the same philosophies as the Neumann large-capsule U series.

 

 

A Gefell M 930 cardioid condenser microphone.

 

The Gefell M 930 is renowned for its warm, natural sound, and low cost. Where a modern U 67 vacuum-tube microphone can be purchased for about $8,000, and a vintage U 67 for $30,000, the FET-based Gefells can be bought today for about $1,200 each.

These are amazing FET microphones that sound far better than Neumann FET versions. In fact, in side-by-side comparisons on captures of instruments ranging from woodwinds to pianos, the M930 sonically outperforms the Neumann FET-based U 87 all day long.

Sometimes, lower-cost and better-engineered products can beat their brethren. All it takes to find them is a good set of ears and an open mind.

 

Header image courtesy of Pexels.com/Amin Asbaghipour.

This article is based on a series of Paul’s Posts from March 2024.

0 comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments

Your avatar

Loading comments...

🗑️ Delete Comment

Enter moderator password to delete this comment:

✏️ Edit Comment

Enter your email to verify ownership: