I find music I am familiar w/ significant improvement all aspects of the sound, instrument separation is
better, I am not setting the volume so high (I believe the Gain Cell is responsible for this) The VPI is the
star of the system. There are sounds in the grooves of my lp's that have suddenly emerged. Dave Brubeck,
Robert Glaspher, Donald Fagen, Steely Dan, Snarky Puppy, Stan Getz, Chuck Mangione, Allman Brothers are
Sitting here listening to the 72-hour-old GCD playing Fragile from the Kenny Barron Trio. Served up via Roon
and upsampled to DSD128.
There is a lot going on in this track between the piano, bass, and drum kit. I can hear and differentiate it
all. Precise, deep soundstage. I can hear drummer Victor Lewis' light cymbal and snare taps clearly, and
they are coming from the right place. Awesome.
In the room!
The piano was as close to “in the room” as I have heard here. The SACD version of the same album was very
good….but, missing some of the clarity that the GCD imparted to the plain old red book CD. The difference, I
think, is which DAC is doing the DACing here. The Essence is upsampling LPCM 88.2 to 192K, then pushing it
through whatever DAC is in there. The analog preamp part of the GCD is doing a great job with what it is
getting from the Essence, but, I have to say, the red book CD version using the GCD DAC and preamp sounds
better than the SACD through the Essence DAC thence to the GCD preamp section. This is depressing, given
what I had hoped for from SACDs…..but, gives me inspiration to, someday, get a transport that will feed
native DSD to my GCD.
Wide sound stage
My impression of the SGCD's sound is that it's very realistic; it provides thick and powerful vocals,
detailed sound, and makes me feel like I'm on a wide sound stage. I listened to “Norah Jones – Come Away
With Me -Don't know why” (FLAC:192khz/24bit); The vocals are focused at the center and are coming more
forward. Each instrument is well separated. I also tried the DSD file “Bill Evans – Some Other Time – Some
Other Time” (DSD 5.6Mhz): the sound was very smooth and relaxing. The sound is detailed but it is not the
kind of that sound that makes you tired after 10 minutes. I also tested with SACD – “Tchaikovsky - Symphony
No. 6; Nutcracker Suite” (conducted by Seiji Ozawa). It gives a much better, fuller sound stage than when I
connect directly to my integrated amplifier.
I was already pleased with the sound of the Nuwave DSD DAC, but am now more pleased than ever with the
amazing quality of the SGCD DAC with its fantastic quality pre-amplifier. As I mentioned in my earlier post,
the DAC is also a great fit in my household due to its slick appearance and convenient features (backlit
volume display, remote, etc). Many thanks to the PS Audio team for another amazing product.
So far so good! I'm only 75 hours in and I'm absolutely loving my Stellar Gain Cell Dac!! Expansive
soundstage, beautiful dynamics, crisp and warm, musical sounding, detailed, sharp looking in black with a
gorgeous display, and able to expertly handle everything I've thrown at it. From Seal to Chopin, Hebie
Hancock to Bach Solo Cello Suites, Adel to the Beatles, and the Who to Frank Sinatra, it all sounds amazing.
Voicing of every source is equally well implemented. Streaming, cds and vinyl each sound, well in a word,
“Stellar”. Did I mention I love it!!!
I am keeping it!
So, how does the Stellar GCD's DAC function compare to either the Benchmark or Light Harmonics Pulse? The
Benchmark always struck me as being a slightly less dynamic and easy to listen to, with ever-so-slight
hardness in the midrange compared to either the older PS Audio Perfect Wave DAC or the PS Audio Direct
Stream DAC that replaced it. Regardless of the Stellar GCD's shortcomings noted above, it is still better
than the Benchmark DAC 2.
With the LH Pulse, the comparison is more nuanced. Light Harmonics exceeded expectations when they came out
with the LH Pulse DAC. Honestly, I've never owned a better DAC under $2K. I've now spent a few hours going
back and forth between the Stellar GCD and the LH Pulse. (I've got the LH plugged into the second set of
analogue single-ended inputs, so I simply move the coax cable from one unit to the other and switch inputs
on the GCD.) Maybe, just maybe, there's a little bit more air in the LH presentation, maybe a little more
ease, I think—and then I play the same content on the Stellar GCD and say “nah, couldn't be! This sounds
great!” So, I'd say the Stellar GCD is virtually neck-and-neck with the LH Pulse S. That is high praise!
As a package, then, the Stellar GCD gives you a preamp that sounds fantastic for the price, and also a DAC
that sounds fantastic for the price! One chassis, no additional interconnects needed, as simple to operate
as anything you might already own. It's a tremendous value, and a component that will give deep musical
satisfaction. Yes, I'm keeping it!
Preamp quality: the Preamp function is flawless with 100 very fine steps that change at a slow but
reasonable speed when the remote volume up/down button is held down. My other preamp is a Hattor active
preamp from poland with dual burson supreme sound v5 opamps which also has 12db of gain and a balanced 64
step resistor based attenuator controlled by relays to only put 2 resistors in the path at once. The gain
cell dac was just as transparent as the Hattor, which is known for transparency and perfect left/right
volume balance due to the precise resistors used for attenuation. The Gain Cell dac includes more inputs and
outputs and this versatility is appreciated vs the smaller Hattor. In general I prefer the gain cell dac's
preamp to my Hattor which is a high compliment as the Hattor is audiophile minimal in design and is a two
box design with a seperate linear regulated power supply box.
Headphone amp quality: A real bonus that should be advertised more. This headphone amp is superior to the
Lehmann headphone amp in my Vinshine soekris dac. A step above in all ways but especially bass which can be
a little loose and slow with the Lehmann using my HD800. It was as good as the Schiit Jotunheim I borrowed
using the single ended 1/4" jack on the Jotunheim.
I'm a bass whore
Typically, in my experience, with an increase in the top-end, comes the dreaded increase in the upper
mid-range also. Like most people, my ears are able to hear the 3k-5k frequency quite easily, and listener
fatigue can set in when this frequency range is too present. With the Stellar Dac, this part of the
mid-range is not over-bearing at all. It is very natural sounding to me. Voices are clear but not edgy.
Trumpets and violins don't get shrill. I'm really happy with the mid-range signature of the Dac.
I'll admit, I've got some "bass-whore" in me. I like a good amount of defined, punchy, accurate bass.
Without it, I lose interest in most any type of music. It's what I listen for at the beginning of seemingly
every song I listen to. If Bob S. and Paul M. didn't get this right, this Dac would be a "Fail" for me.
Luckily, I feel they nailed the signature of the bottom-end, also. It is deep and low without bloat. It has
good definition. Like the mids and highs of the Dac, the low-end is superb. Actually, the bass is quite
musical. To say the Stellar Dac is musical in the bottom-end specifically, is quite a compliment, since that
area of the frequency range has to be fleshed out properly in order to be musical, while not effecting the
mid-range negatively.The Dac is able to present plenty of quality low-end without sacrificing the critical
mid-range. I'll bet most Dacs in this price range can't pull this off.
Synergy-wise, the Stellar Dac does a heck-of-a-job in my system. I feel the Dac is able to convey the mood
of the recording that it's asked to reproduce - and does it effortlessly. I use a computer front end and
bi-amp my Eggleston Works Andra IIIs with QSC class A/B amps. The sound is lively and engaging. The sound
stage doesn't "cry uncle" and collapse or get jumbled-up when the volume goes up to reference level and
beyond. It remains wide and accurate, and the performers keep their individual space up in the front of the
listening room. When Mark Knopfler sings "Wherever I Go" with Ruth Moody, they are now split up a bit, and
side by side, as they perform in the center of my sound stage. They no longer somehow occupy the same space,
defying the laws of physics. I'm guessing that all the attributes of this Dac are, at the foundation,
stemming from a properly designed and implemented power supply. To be quick, musical, and controlled at the
same time takes some good engineering. I'm impressed. This Stellar Dac has found a good home.
With any good recording, my system will energize the room with instruments placed front, back, and side to
side from my listening chair. The Oppo did a good job with this effect, in general, but I was sometimes
having to work to see the images in the sound field. (this was using the HDCD decoding in the Oppo). Next I
switched to the Stellar DAC and sat down to listen. On the very first hearing the GCD had impressive imaging
of instruments with very good instrument localization and air. It also had very good frequency extension at
both ends of the frequency range. The imaging was improved over the Oppo, with easier to resolve instrument
placing in the sound field, and a more realistic and solid image outlines. I did not have to work as much to
perceive the instrument's location and I felt a better connection with the music on the GCD. I felt like the
GCD had better realism that allowed me to get sucked into the music and forget the outside world for a
while. For me, this is my acid test of a playback system.
Regarding true live and non-reinforced performances; the venue doors swing open and you enter, it is almost
a revelation. The lack of anything between you and the musicians, their instruments, is like waking up from
a nap in the sun. It is bright, clear, resolute. This Dac-Pre recreates these experiences. The Stellar gives
you that cooler day, sparkling clarity, cold when you take a deep breath…and dry…not thick or warm. This is
a day you could see for miles and miles. This is the clarity the Stellar is capable of, extreme resolution,
deep into the music, stable images, extreme placement of performances.
- L Couplin
This is going to be fun!
I've listened to a couple of albums now (via JRiver as described above). The sound is already coming alive…
in fact, it's faaaantastic! I'm currently listening to Robert Cray, Strong Persuader (high rez FLAC file).
The detail and punch are just what they should be. His voice is clear and centered, surrounded by nicely
balanced treble and bass. Another wonderfully engineered recording and the Stellar GCD shows it off in fine
fashion. The clarity has improved and the veil has lifted. Wow, this is going to be fun!
To cut to the chase - the GCD is a keeper. My one-word lasting impression is: S W E E T. This thing is SOOO
easy to listen to. There's oodles of detail, but always presented in an effortless way that the NFB can't
quite capture. The GCD is also superior in how it portrays the soundstage. It's bigger than the NFB-28 and
every bit as dynamic. Most of my listening was done comparing the GCD via the PWT through the I2S input, vs.
a standard digital coax to the NFB. Granted, this puts the NFB at a disadvantage, but why wouldn't you want
to take advantage of the best connection between the two PS units? When I used the same coax to the GCD, the
differences between them were smaller. However, I still preferred the GCD's sound
It's just better, plain and simple
After swapping the Pioneer SA-8500 for the Stellar GCD I sat down and pressed play and set the volume on the
Stellar GCD, closed my eyes once again. I couldn't believe that "One" could sound even better. It's just
better, plain and simple. Stellar made the music come to life even more. Everything you want to be better
when you're listening to music was better. Throw out any audiophile adverb and whatever it is, it was
improved. I'm not using balanced XLR cable connections or audiophile power cables or even a power
conditioner. These are gold plated Parts Express RCA connections and copper speaker wires, nothing special.
I have to say my favorite track is Fiona Joy. I can see the hammers hitting the strings with each note,
amazing. The snare on track two, wow!!! I can literally reach out and touch that snare at the end of my
ottoman. How??? I'm in love! I threw in Nils Lofgren next of course. I personally like Some must Dream
better than Keith Don't Go. On the Stellar GCD the separation of the two guitars was more separate. The two
voices were more separated also. I could pinpoint their locations better. Even CD's that aren't "great"
recordings were "purer"? I could hear things I hadn't noticed before. You can distinguish between each
instrument and voices so much better, clearer I guess. Looking forward to the rest of the evenings this week
to play. I'm also ripping all my CD's to my NAS through my MAC Mini. I'll be plugging that into the Stellar
GCD later this week.
- Troy Baldwin