COPPER

A PS Audio Publication

Issue 38 • Free Online Magazine

Issue 38 HOBGOBLIN

Wine and Chocolate

I don’t drink wine, but I’m fascinated by it. The rituals, the industry, the marketing.

I do drink chocolate, because I decided I need some sort of vice, and after all, chocolate is about as perfect a vice one can have. And I showed up just as the chocolate industry started down the road to being as much like wine as they can be.

Hang in for just a few paragraphs, I’ll bring it back to audio. Thanks for your patience.

Twenty years ago, John Scharffenberger launched the first bean to bar chocolate in the United States. He was the only maker (not Nestle, not Hershey, not anyone) who was buying beans directly from small farms and then, using vintage equipment, turning them into chocolate. John was a winemaker, and he fully understood terroir and floral notes, as well as storytelling, branding and culture.

It took a few months, but his team discovered that chefs didn’t see a real need to switch from big blocks of the French chocolate they’d always used, but that consumers were eager to embrace this new hobby.

Because they were buying a story, a lifestyle and a set of expectations.

Fast forward to today, when there are more than a hundred bean to bar companies in the US. And every bar tastes different, every bar has a story. We’ve gone from the banal dollar Nestle milk chocolate bar to the $14 Rogue Porcelana 84% dark bar, made in batches of a few hundred at a time.

Right about now, the ‘shoulds’ start to appear.

You should like this one more than that one.

I was sitting with Carlos, the head of Cacao Hunters, a new bean to bar venture in Colombia, and we were tasting his stuff. I couldn’t help it–part of me started worrying that I wasn’t tasting what I was supposed to taste. After all, Carlos is a pro, this is what he does. How dare I speak up and say what I tasted?

What if I was wrong?

The wine folks figured this out a very long time ago. A large number of well-heeled people don’t want to be wrong. Being wrong isn’t what got them to be well-heeled, after all.

And so they await instructions. They look for clues (like price!) to help them figure out if they like something for not.

So that’s my first point: if you go into a hobby seeking reassurance, you’re likely to find it. There are plenty of people happy to tell you what you should like.

And it turns out that more often than not, being told you should like something makes it more likely that you will like it! This alone might be enough reason to read stereo magazines.

The second thing: After six or seven bars, Carlos and I took a break. We spent about an hour talking about his marketing strategy and drinking tea. Then I grabbed an unopened bar from a small experimental batch, tasted it and said, “wow, this is the single best thing we’ve had all day.”

With chagrin, I realized that it was the very same varietal we’d tasted two hours earlier.

But here’s the kicker: we went back to that first bar and compared it to the second one, the one I had just opened. They didn’t taste at all alike. Same beans, different taste.

That’s because, like music, like room tone, we’re dealing with something that’s really hard to quantify. That’s because beans grow on trees, and one tree is in fact going to taste really different from another one.

The should on the table: They both should have tasted the same, and my taste buds should have realized that they were the same. The truth, though, was quite different.

In this case, my taste buds were confirmed by others. They did actually taste different (to us, anyway). But it’s not that simple.

In research in the Journal of Wine Economics, researchers found that among judges at wine competitions (judges!), blind tasting of wine led judges to say a glass of wine was different 90% of the time when it was actually the same wine. Nine out of ten times, they didn’t taste what they should have.

I was thinking about this when I was sitting in the listening room of one of the most famous audio reviewers of this moment. And I thought his stereo sounded lousy. Of course, I didn’t say anything, because I shouldn’t hear that, and because who am I to question the emperor and because, hey, bad things happen in basements.

You are welcome to sign up for ‘should’. Or, if you want, you can just enjoy what you listen to.

If you like it, that’s good enough for me.

Originally published in Copper #2.

More from Issue 38

View All Articles in Issue 38

Search Copper Magazine

#228 Serita’s Black Rose Duo Shakes Your Soul With a Blend of Funk, Rock, Blues and a Whole Lot More by Frank Doris Mar 02, 2026 #228 Vinyl, A Love Story by Wayne Robins Mar 02, 2026 #228 Thrill Seeker by B. Jan Montana Mar 02, 2026 #228 The Vinyl Beat: Donald Byrd, Bill Evans, Wes Montgomery, Eddie Palmieri and Frank Sinatra by Rudy Radelic Mar 02, 2026 #228 Listening to Prestige: The History of a Vitally Important Jazz Record Label by Frank Doris Mar 02, 2026 #228 How to Play in a Rock Band, 21: Touring With James Lee Stanley by Frank Doris Mar 02, 2026 #228 The NAMM 2026 Show: The Music Industry’s Premier Event by John Volanski Mar 02, 2026 #228 The Earliest Stars of Country Music, Part Two by Jeff Weiner Mar 02, 2026 #228 From The Audiophile's Guide: A Brief History of Stereophonic Sound by Paul McGowan Mar 02, 2026 #228 A Bone to Pick With Streaming Audio by Frank Doris Mar 02, 2026 #228 Blast Off With Bluesman Duke Robillard by Ray Chelstowski Mar 02, 2026 #228 A Visit to the Marten Loudspeaker Factory in Göteborg, Sweden by Ingo Schulz and Sebastian Polcyn Mar 02, 2026 #228 Pure Distortion by Peter Xeni Mar 02, 2026 #228 A Nagra Factory Tour by Markus "Marsu" Manthey Mar 02, 2026 #228 Back to My Reel-to-Reel Roots, Part 27: Noodge and Ye Shall Receive, Part Two by Ken Kessler Mar 02, 2026 #228 PS Audio in the News by PS Audio Staff Mar 02, 2026 #228 90-Degree Stereo by Frank Doris Mar 02, 2026 #228 The Keys to Art by Rich Isaacs Mar 02, 2026 #227 Seth Lewis Gets in the Groove With Take a Look Around: a Tribute to the Meters by Frank Doris Feb 02, 2026 #227 Passport to Sound: May Anwar’s Audio Learning Experience for Young People by Frank Doris Feb 02, 2026 #227 Conjectures on Cosmic Consciousness by B. Jan Montana Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Big Takeover Turns 45 by Wayne Robins Feb 02, 2026 #227 Music and Chocolate: On the Sensory Connection by Joe Caplan Feb 02, 2026 #227 Singer/Songwriter Chris Berardo: Getting Wilder All the Time by Ray Chelstowski Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Earliest Stars of Country Music, Part One by Jeff Weiner Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Vinyl Beat Goes Down to Tijuana (By Way of Los Angeles), Part Two by Rudy Radelic Feb 02, 2026 #227 How to Play in a Rock Band, 20: On the Road With Blood, Sweat & Tears’ Guitarist Gabe Cummins by Frank Doris Feb 02, 2026 #227 From The Audiophile’s Guide: Audio Specs and Measuring by Paul McGowan Feb 02, 2026 #227 Our Brain is Always Listening by Peter Trübner Feb 02, 2026 #227 PS Audio in the News by PS Audio Staff Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Listening Chair: Sleek Style and Sound From the Luxman L3 by Howard Kneller Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Los Angeles and Orange County Audio Society Celebrates Its 32nd Anniversary, Honoring David and Sheryl Lee Wilson and Bernie Grundman by Harris Fogel Feb 02, 2026 #227 Back to My Reel-to-Reel Roots, Part 26: Half Full – Not Half Empty, Redux by Ken Kessler Feb 02, 2026 #227 That's What Puzzles Us... by Frank Doris Feb 02, 2026 #227 Record-Breaking by Peter Xeni Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Long and Winding Road by B. Jan Montana Feb 02, 2026 #226 JJ Murphy’s Sleep Paralysis is a Genre-Bending Musical Journey Through Jazz, Fusion and More by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 Stewardship by Consent by B. Jan Montana Jan 05, 2026 #226 Food, Music, and Sensory Experience: An Interview With Professor Jonathan Zearfoss of the Culinary Institute of America by Joe Caplan Jan 05, 2026 #226 Studio Confidential: A Who’s Who of Recording Engineers Tell Their Stories by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 Pilot Radio is Reborn, 50 Years Later: Talking With CEO Barak Epstein by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 The Vinyl Beat Goes Down to Tijuana (By Way of Los Angeles), Part One by Rudy Radelic Jan 05, 2026 #226 Capital Audiofest 2025: Must-See Stereo, Part Two by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 My Morning Jacket’s Carl Broemel and Tyler Ramsey Collaborate on Their Acoustic Guitar Album, Celestun by Ray Chelstowski Jan 05, 2026 #226 The People Who Make Audio Happen: CanJam SoCal 2025, Part Two by Harris Fogel Jan 05, 2026 #226 How to Play in a Rock Band, 19: Touring Can Make You Crazy, Part One by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 Linda Ronstadt Goes Bigger by Wayne Robins Jan 05, 2026

Wine and Chocolate

I don’t drink wine, but I’m fascinated by it. The rituals, the industry, the marketing.

I do drink chocolate, because I decided I need some sort of vice, and after all, chocolate is about as perfect a vice one can have. And I showed up just as the chocolate industry started down the road to being as much like wine as they can be.

Hang in for just a few paragraphs, I’ll bring it back to audio. Thanks for your patience.

Twenty years ago, John Scharffenberger launched the first bean to bar chocolate in the United States. He was the only maker (not Nestle, not Hershey, not anyone) who was buying beans directly from small farms and then, using vintage equipment, turning them into chocolate. John was a winemaker, and he fully understood terroir and floral notes, as well as storytelling, branding and culture.

It took a few months, but his team discovered that chefs didn’t see a real need to switch from big blocks of the French chocolate they’d always used, but that consumers were eager to embrace this new hobby.

Because they were buying a story, a lifestyle and a set of expectations.

Fast forward to today, when there are more than a hundred bean to bar companies in the US. And every bar tastes different, every bar has a story. We’ve gone from the banal dollar Nestle milk chocolate bar to the $14 Rogue Porcelana 84% dark bar, made in batches of a few hundred at a time.

Right about now, the ‘shoulds’ start to appear.

You should like this one more than that one.

I was sitting with Carlos, the head of Cacao Hunters, a new bean to bar venture in Colombia, and we were tasting his stuff. I couldn’t help it–part of me started worrying that I wasn’t tasting what I was supposed to taste. After all, Carlos is a pro, this is what he does. How dare I speak up and say what I tasted?

What if I was wrong?

The wine folks figured this out a very long time ago. A large number of well-heeled people don’t want to be wrong. Being wrong isn’t what got them to be well-heeled, after all.

And so they await instructions. They look for clues (like price!) to help them figure out if they like something for not.

So that’s my first point: if you go into a hobby seeking reassurance, you’re likely to find it. There are plenty of people happy to tell you what you should like.

And it turns out that more often than not, being told you should like something makes it more likely that you will like it! This alone might be enough reason to read stereo magazines.

The second thing: After six or seven bars, Carlos and I took a break. We spent about an hour talking about his marketing strategy and drinking tea. Then I grabbed an unopened bar from a small experimental batch, tasted it and said, “wow, this is the single best thing we’ve had all day.”

With chagrin, I realized that it was the very same varietal we’d tasted two hours earlier.

But here’s the kicker: we went back to that first bar and compared it to the second one, the one I had just opened. They didn’t taste at all alike. Same beans, different taste.

That’s because, like music, like room tone, we’re dealing with something that’s really hard to quantify. That’s because beans grow on trees, and one tree is in fact going to taste really different from another one.

The should on the table: They both should have tasted the same, and my taste buds should have realized that they were the same. The truth, though, was quite different.

In this case, my taste buds were confirmed by others. They did actually taste different (to us, anyway). But it’s not that simple.

In research in the Journal of Wine Economics, researchers found that among judges at wine competitions (judges!), blind tasting of wine led judges to say a glass of wine was different 90% of the time when it was actually the same wine. Nine out of ten times, they didn’t taste what they should have.

I was thinking about this when I was sitting in the listening room of one of the most famous audio reviewers of this moment. And I thought his stereo sounded lousy. Of course, I didn’t say anything, because I shouldn’t hear that, and because who am I to question the emperor and because, hey, bad things happen in basements.

You are welcome to sign up for ‘should’. Or, if you want, you can just enjoy what you listen to.

If you like it, that’s good enough for me.

Originally published in Copper #2.

0 comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments

Your avatar

Loading comments...

🗑️ Delete Comment

Enter moderator password to delete this comment:

✏️ Edit Comment

Enter your email to verify ownership: