Copper Magazine · Issue 43 · A free PS Audio publication
Issue 43 VINTAGE WHINE

Tone Control (or lack of it)

I’ve previously mourned the death of tone in modern audio gear, and written about wood in audio gear. As far as I’m concerned, we’re talking about two sides of the same coin.

There was a time when every radio and preamp had some type of tone control that could be used to compensate for deficiencies in recordings, or to a certain extent, the room. -Or, even, adjust the sound to match personal taste, or just to crank up the bass when the thunder-sheets are going in the Ring cycle, or for Jack Bruce’s intro to “Badge”. When you look at the much-loved Audio Research SP-3 shown above, what do you see?

Tone controls. Not just the usual treble and bass, but a contour control which altered the slope of the bass and treble controls. They were useful. Not every recording is perfect—in fact,very few are— and those tone controls were particularly useful in the ear-bleeding days of early CDs and certain moving-coil cartridges.

So: where did they go?

As is often the case in the history of high-end audio, credit and/or blame can be ascribed to Harry Pearson. Amidst the numerous pieces he wrote about the SP-3 and its multitude of alphanumeric variants, HP commented that the sound was notably better with the tone controls switched out of the circuit (one of the five push-buttons at the bottom of the faceplate switched out the tone controls). And so it was, largely due to a decrease in noise. If memory serves (and increasingly these days, it does not) one of the changes wrought by the Paoli mod of the SP-3a-1-et al was to eliminate the tone control circuit entirely. Snip-snip.

From that point, the deficiencies of one circuit in one particular preamp were transformed into a philosophical movement of sorts, one whose rallying cry was “a straight wire with gain!!”

The first product from Mark Levinson Audio Systems that I was aware of was the decidedly pro-looking LNP-2 (Low-Noise Preamplifier), designed by pro-side engineer Dick Burwen, complete with not two but three tone controls. (Side note: the LNP-2’s $1750 price tag in 1973 was almost three times the price of the SP-3, and equates to more than $10,000 today.)

But the Levinson product  that broke through in the audiophile world, again courtesy of HP, was the minimalist JC-2 preamp designed by John Curl. See the difference? No tone controls, and the pitch is even based upon that straight line thing. Note that there was no way to alter frequency response, but gain could be adjusted independently for each channel, in 1 dB steps, no less. While channel-matching in volume pots is sometimes inexact, dual volume controls are a pain to live with.–Yes, I digress. Sorry.


By the time Audio Research came out with the SP-6 (the real heir to the SP-3, not the contentious SP-4 and SP-5), tone controls were nowhere to be found. Sniff.

 

And yet, and yet: as Mark Levinson moved on to found Cello, he apparently saw the need for an ultra-sophisticated tone control (or more likely, sensed the market for one). The Cello Audio Palette was more complex and versatile than anything seen since the ancient Altec Acousta-Voicette, the granddaddy of all graphic equalizers. The Audio Palette replaced the grotty sliders of the Altec with  precision rotary controls. Despite the 12 knobs on the unit, only the bottom six altered frequency response—the top six were rather extensive preamp controls.

Like the LNP-2, the Audio Palette was the work of Dick Burwen. In terms of raw geekiness and gadget-lust, the Palette is pretty much the ultimate. I’ve never seen anyone able to walk past one without clicking at least one of the stepped rotary controls.

So: here we are, in an era in which frequency response can be contoured in zillionths of a dB in the digital mode (horrors!). Does anyone do that? Aside from digital crossovers and room-correction devices like those from DEQX, mostly no. One exception: yep, Dick Burwen is still around, and offers Audio Splendor, software-based tone controls and ambience generation. Despite my Luddite resistance to complex mucking about with frequency response—especially through a computer—knowing Dick, I’d bet that it works, and works well.

One problem…there aren’t any knobs!

More from Issue 43

View All Articles in Issue 43

Search Copper Magazine

#236 Magic Boy: The Jimi Hendrix Experience, Live and Rediscovered by Frank Doris Nov 02, 2026 #236 The Great Rhythmic Divide: Composer David Chesky Asks, Why Doesn't the Symphony Orchestra Groove? by David Chesky Nov 02, 2026 #236 More Record Reviews: Roni Eytan’s Microtonal Harmonica, Jane Ira Bloom, and a Frank Zappa Freak Out by Frank Doris Nov 02, 2026 #236 An Album of Inviting Beauty: Goodnight Moon from Acoustic Eidolon, And an Interview With the Artists Who Created it by Frank Doris Nov 02, 2026 #236 Never Ignore Your Inner Voice by B. Jan Montana Nov 02, 2026 #236 Composer Joseph Bertolozzi Uses Bridges, Structures and the World as Musical Instruments, Part One by Joe Caplan Nov 02, 2026 #236 Transmission: A Powerful Horn-Loaded Album from the Huntertones by Ray Chelstowski Nov 02, 2026 #236 Les Quatre Saisons du Québec: a New “Four Seasons” on Tour and on ATMA Classique by Robert Schryer Nov 02, 2026 #236 From The Audiophile's Guide: A Glossary of Terms for Today's Audio Systems, A – M by Paul McGowan Nov 02, 2026 #236 From The Listening Chair: An Introduction to Audiophile Tweaks by Howard Kneller Nov 02, 2026 #236 The Vinyl Beat Grew Two Inches Since October! by Rudy Radelic Nov 02, 2026 #236 How to Play in a Rock Band, Part 29: Figuring Out How to Play the Songs by Frank Doris Nov 02, 2026 #236 The Return of the Residents: Eskimo is On the Road by Wayne Robins Nov 02, 2026 #236 PS Audio in the News by PS Audio Staff Nov 02, 2026 #236 The People Who Make Audio Happen – Fun In Las Vegas at…CES 2026? by Harris Fogel Nov 02, 2026 #236 The Forms of Things Unknown by Frank Doris Nov 02, 2026 #236 Prophetic by Peter Xeni Nov 02, 2026 #236 Here's Looking at You, Kid by Rich Isaacs Nov 02, 2026 Favorites From T.H.E. Show SoCal 2026 by Cam Martin Oct 05, 2026 #235 Singer/Songwriter John David Schrader: On the Need to Create, Part Two by Joe Caplan Oct 05, 2026 #235 A Life in High-End Audio: The Roy Hall Interview, Part Two by Frank Doris Oct 05, 2026 #235 Grammy-Winning Producer, Songwriter, and Guitarist John Leventhal Goes Instrumental With National Drift by Ray Chelstowski Oct 05, 2026 #235 From Swimming Pool to New Listening Room—to Founding an Accidental Audio Company by Gilles Laferrière Oct 05, 2026 #235 The Vinyl Beat’s Size Matters Edition by Rudy Radelic Oct 05, 2026 #235 The Sublime Complexities of Nature by B. Jan Montana Oct 05, 2026 #235 How to Play In a Rock Band, 28: Growing Older and Dealing With It by Frank Doris Oct 05, 2026 #235 Young Rascals: From Bar Band to Stardom by Wayne Robins Oct 05, 2026 #235 Duncan Sheik: In Memoriam by Ray Chelstowski Oct 05, 2026 #235 From The Listening Chair: The Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones by Howard Kneller Oct 05, 2026 #235 Checking Out Some NOLA Loudspeakers – and Some Thoughts About Audio Writing by Frank Doris Oct 05, 2026 #235 The Kanazawa Phonograph Museum: Music from a Time Capsule by Sebastian Polcyn Oct 05, 2026 #235 PS Audio in the News by PS Audio Staff Oct 05, 2026 #235 From The Audiophile’s Guide: Making the Most Critical Choice by Paul McGowan Oct 05, 2026 #235 Evolutionary Growth by Frank Doris Oct 05, 2026 #235 Speed Racer by Peter Xeni Oct 05, 2026 #235 Happy Halloween! by James Schrimpf Oct 05, 2026 #234 A Life in High-End Audio: The Roy Hall Interview, Part One by Frank Doris Sep 07, 2026 #234 Jason Greenlaw Offers His Personal Perspective on Jazz Guitar in Vantage Point by Frank Doris Sep 07, 2026 #234 Transcendent Phoenix: Lucina Yue Brings the Ancient Konghou Into Modern Times by Frank Doris Sep 07, 2026 #234 We Must All Follow Our Bliss by B. Jan Montana Sep 07, 2026 #234 How to Play in a Rock Band, 27: Leveling Up by Frank Doris Sep 07, 2026 #234 Ross Valory: Traveling Into New Musical Territory With All of the Above by Ray Chelstowski Sep 07, 2026 #234 Singer/Songwriter John David Schrader: On the Need to Create by Joe Caplan Sep 07, 2026 #234 The People Who Make Audio Happen: More From T.H.E. Show SoCal 2026 by Harris Fogel Sep 07, 2026 #234 The Vinyl Beat Digs Into the Gadget Box by Rudy Radelic Sep 07, 2026 #234 The Rolling Stones: Foreign Tongues Spoken Loud by Wayne Robins Sep 07, 2026 #234 Musical Moments by Rich Isaacs Sep 07, 2026

Tone Control (or lack of it)

I’ve previously mourned the death of tone in modern audio gear, and written about wood in audio gear. As far as I’m concerned, we’re talking about two sides of the same coin.

There was a time when every radio and preamp had some type of tone control that could be used to compensate for deficiencies in recordings, or to a certain extent, the room. -Or, even, adjust the sound to match personal taste, or just to crank up the bass when the thunder-sheets are going in the Ring cycle, or for Jack Bruce’s intro to “Badge”. When you look at the much-loved Audio Research SP-3 shown above, what do you see?

Tone controls. Not just the usual treble and bass, but a contour control which altered the slope of the bass and treble controls. They were useful. Not every recording is perfect—in fact,very few are— and those tone controls were particularly useful in the ear-bleeding days of early CDs and certain moving-coil cartridges.

So: where did they go?

As is often the case in the history of high-end audio, credit and/or blame can be ascribed to Harry Pearson. Amidst the numerous pieces he wrote about the SP-3 and its multitude of alphanumeric variants, HP commented that the sound was notably better with the tone controls switched out of the circuit (one of the five push-buttons at the bottom of the faceplate switched out the tone controls). And so it was, largely due to a decrease in noise. If memory serves (and increasingly these days, it does not) one of the changes wrought by the Paoli mod of the SP-3a-1-et al was to eliminate the tone control circuit entirely. Snip-snip.

From that point, the deficiencies of one circuit in one particular preamp were transformed into a philosophical movement of sorts, one whose rallying cry was “a straight wire with gain!!”

The first product from Mark Levinson Audio Systems that I was aware of was the decidedly pro-looking LNP-2 (Low-Noise Preamplifier), designed by pro-side engineer Dick Burwen, complete with not two but three tone controls. (Side note: the LNP-2’s $1750 price tag in 1973 was almost three times the price of the SP-3, and equates to more than $10,000 today.)

But the Levinson product  that broke through in the audiophile world, again courtesy of HP, was the minimalist JC-2 preamp designed by John Curl. See the difference? No tone controls, and the pitch is even based upon that straight line thing. Note that there was no way to alter frequency response, but gain could be adjusted independently for each channel, in 1 dB steps, no less. While channel-matching in volume pots is sometimes inexact, dual volume controls are a pain to live with.–Yes, I digress. Sorry.


By the time Audio Research came out with the SP-6 (the real heir to the SP-3, not the contentious SP-4 and SP-5), tone controls were nowhere to be found. Sniff.

 

And yet, and yet: as Mark Levinson moved on to found Cello, he apparently saw the need for an ultra-sophisticated tone control (or more likely, sensed the market for one). The Cello Audio Palette was more complex and versatile than anything seen since the ancient Altec Acousta-Voicette, the granddaddy of all graphic equalizers. The Audio Palette replaced the grotty sliders of the Altec with  precision rotary controls. Despite the 12 knobs on the unit, only the bottom six altered frequency response—the top six were rather extensive preamp controls.

Like the LNP-2, the Audio Palette was the work of Dick Burwen. In terms of raw geekiness and gadget-lust, the Palette is pretty much the ultimate. I’ve never seen anyone able to walk past one without clicking at least one of the stepped rotary controls.

So: here we are, in an era in which frequency response can be contoured in zillionths of a dB in the digital mode (horrors!). Does anyone do that? Aside from digital crossovers and room-correction devices like those from DEQX, mostly no. One exception: yep, Dick Burwen is still around, and offers Audio Splendor, software-based tone controls and ambience generation. Despite my Luddite resistance to complex mucking about with frequency response—especially through a computer—knowing Dick, I’d bet that it works, and works well.

One problem…there aren’t any knobs!

0 comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments

Your avatar

Loading comments...

🗑️ Delete Comment

Enter moderator password to delete this comment:

✏️ Edit Comment

Enter your email to verify ownership: