COPPER

A PS Audio Publication

Issue 43 • Free Online Magazine

Issue 43 VINTAGE WHINE

Tone Control (or lack of it)

I’ve previously mourned the death of tone in modern audio gear, and written about wood in audio gear. As far as I’m concerned, we’re talking about two sides of the same coin.

There was a time when every radio and preamp had some type of tone control that could be used to compensate for deficiencies in recordings, or to a certain extent, the room. -Or, even, adjust the sound to match personal taste, or just to crank up the bass when the thunder-sheets are going in the Ring cycle, or for Jack Bruce’s intro to “Badge”. When you look at the much-loved Audio Research SP-3 shown above, what do you see?

Tone controls. Not just the usual treble and bass, but a contour control which altered the slope of the bass and treble controls. They were useful. Not every recording is perfect—in fact,very few are— and those tone controls were particularly useful in the ear-bleeding days of early CDs and certain moving-coil cartridges.

So: where did they go?

As is often the case in the history of high-end audio, credit and/or blame can be ascribed to Harry Pearson. Amidst the numerous pieces he wrote about the SP-3 and its multitude of alphanumeric variants, HP commented that the sound was notably better with the tone controls switched out of the circuit (one of the five push-buttons at the bottom of the faceplate switched out the tone controls). And so it was, largely due to a decrease in noise. If memory serves (and increasingly these days, it does not) one of the changes wrought by the Paoli mod of the SP-3a-1-et al was to eliminate the tone control circuit entirely. Snip-snip.

From that point, the deficiencies of one circuit in one particular preamp were transformed into a philosophical movement of sorts, one whose rallying cry was “a straight wire with gain!!”

The first product from Mark Levinson Audio Systems that I was aware of was the decidedly pro-looking LNP-2 (Low-Noise Preamplifier), designed by pro-side engineer Dick Burwen, complete with not two but three tone controls. (Side note: the LNP-2’s $1750 price tag in 1973 was almost three times the price of the SP-3, and equates to more than $10,000 today.)

But the Levinson product  that broke through in the audiophile world, again courtesy of HP, was the minimalist JC-2 preamp designed by John Curl. See the difference? No tone controls, and the pitch is even based upon that straight line thing. Note that there was no way to alter frequency response, but gain could be adjusted independently for each channel, in 1 dB steps, no less. While channel-matching in volume pots is sometimes inexact, dual volume controls are a pain to live with.–Yes, I digress. Sorry.


By the time Audio Research came out with the SP-6 (the real heir to the SP-3, not the contentious SP-4 and SP-5), tone controls were nowhere to be found. Sniff.

 

And yet, and yet: as Mark Levinson moved on to found Cello, he apparently saw the need for an ultra-sophisticated tone control (or more likely, sensed the market for one). The Cello Audio Palette was more complex and versatile than anything seen since the ancient Altec Acousta-Voicette, the granddaddy of all graphic equalizers. The Audio Palette replaced the grotty sliders of the Altec with  precision rotary controls. Despite the 12 knobs on the unit, only the bottom six altered frequency response—the top six were rather extensive preamp controls.

Like the LNP-2, the Audio Palette was the work of Dick Burwen. In terms of raw geekiness and gadget-lust, the Palette is pretty much the ultimate. I’ve never seen anyone able to walk past one without clicking at least one of the stepped rotary controls.

So: here we are, in an era in which frequency response can be contoured in zillionths of a dB in the digital mode (horrors!). Does anyone do that? Aside from digital crossovers and room-correction devices like those from DEQX, mostly no. One exception: yep, Dick Burwen is still around, and offers Audio Splendor, software-based tone controls and ambience generation. Despite my Luddite resistance to complex mucking about with frequency response—especially through a computer—knowing Dick, I’d bet that it works, and works well.

One problem…there aren’t any knobs!

More from Issue 43

View All Articles in Issue 43

Search Copper Magazine

#227 Seth Lewis Gets in the Groove With Take a Look Around: a Tribute to the Meters by Frank Doris Feb 02, 2026 #227 Passport to Sound: May Anwar’s Audio Learning Experience for Young People by Frank Doris Feb 02, 2026 #227 Conjectures on Cosmic Consciousness by B. Jan Montana Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Big Takeover Turns 45 by Wayne Robins Feb 02, 2026 #227 Music and Chocolate: On the Sensory Connection by Joe Caplan Feb 02, 2026 #227 Singer/Songwriter Chris Berardo: Getting Wilder All the Time by Ray Chelstowski Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Earliest Stars of Country Music, Part One by Jeff Weiner Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Vinyl Beat Goes Down to Tijuana (By Way of Los Angeles), Part Two by Rudy Radelic Feb 02, 2026 #227 How to Play in a Rock Band, 20: On the Road With Blood, Sweat & Tears’ Guitarist Gabe Cummins by Frank Doris Feb 02, 2026 #227 From The Audiophile’s Guide: Audio Specs and Measuring by Paul McGowan Feb 02, 2026 #227 Our Brain is Always Listening by Peter Trübner Feb 02, 2026 #227 PS Audio in the News by PS Audio Staff Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Listening Chair: Sleek Style and Sound From the Luxman L3 by Howard Kneller Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Los Angeles and Orange County Audio Society Celebrates Its 32nd Anniversary, Honoring David and Sheryl Lee Wilson and Bernie Grundman by Harris Fogel Feb 02, 2026 #227 Back to My Reel-to-Reel Roots, Part 26: Half Full – Not Half Empty, Redux by Ken Kessler Feb 02, 2026 #227 That's What Puzzles Us... by Frank Doris Feb 02, 2026 #227 Record-Breaking by Peter Xeni Feb 02, 2026 #227 The Long and Winding Road by B. Jan Montana Feb 02, 2026 #226 JJ Murphy’s Sleep Paralysis is a Genre-Bending Musical Journey Through Jazz, Fusion and More by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 Stewardship by Consent by B. Jan Montana Jan 05, 2026 #226 Food, Music, and Sensory Experience: An Interview With Professor Jonathan Zearfoss of the Culinary Institute of America by Joe Caplan Jan 05, 2026 #226 Studio Confidential: A Who’s Who of Recording Engineers Tell Their Stories by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 Pilot Radio is Reborn, 50 Years Later: Talking With CEO Barak Epstein by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 The Vinyl Beat Goes Down to Tijuana (By Way of Los Angeles), Part One by Rudy Radelic Jan 05, 2026 #226 Capital Audiofest 2025: Must-See Stereo, Part Two by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 My Morning Jacket’s Carl Broemel and Tyler Ramsey Collaborate on Their Acoustic Guitar Album, Celestun by Ray Chelstowski Jan 05, 2026 #226 The People Who Make Audio Happen: CanJam SoCal 2025, Part Two by Harris Fogel Jan 05, 2026 #226 How to Play in a Rock Band, 19: Touring Can Make You Crazy, Part One by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 Linda Ronstadt Goes Bigger by Wayne Robins Jan 05, 2026 #226 From The Audiophile’s Guide: Active Room Correction and Digital Signal Processing by Paul McGowan Jan 05, 2026 #226 PS Audio in the News by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 Back to My Reel-to-Reel Roots, Part 25: Half-Full, Not Empty by Ken Kessler Jan 05, 2026 #226 Happy New Year! by Frank Doris Jan 05, 2026 #226 Turn It Down! by Peter Xeni Jan 05, 2026 #226 Ghost Riders by James Schrimpf Jan 05, 2026 #226 A Factory Tour of Audio Manufacturer German Physiks by Markus "Marsu" Manthey Jan 04, 2026 #225 Capital Audiofest 2025: Must-See Stereo, Part One by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Otis Taylor and the Electrics Delivers a Powerful Set of Hypnotic Modern Blues by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 A Christmas Miracle by B. Jan Montana Dec 01, 2025 #225 T.H.E. Show New York 2025, Part Two: Plenty to See, Hear, and Enjoy by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 Underappreciated Artists, Part One: Martin Briley by Rich Isaacs Dec 01, 2025 #225 Rock and Roll is Here to Stay by Wayne Robins Dec 01, 2025 #225 A Lifetime of Holiday Record (and CD) Listening by Rudy Radelic Dec 01, 2025 #225 Little Feat: Not Saying Goodbye, Not Yet by Ray Chelstowski Dec 01, 2025 #225 How to Play in a Rock Band, Part 18: Dealing With Burnout by Frank Doris Dec 01, 2025 #225 The People Who Make Audio Happen: CanJam SoCal 2025 by Harris Fogel Dec 01, 2025 #225 Chicago’s Sonic Sanctuaries: Four Hi‑Fi Listening Bars Channeling the Jazz‑Kissa Spirit by Olivier Meunier-Plante Dec 01, 2025

Tone Control (or lack of it)

I’ve previously mourned the death of tone in modern audio gear, and written about wood in audio gear. As far as I’m concerned, we’re talking about two sides of the same coin.

There was a time when every radio and preamp had some type of tone control that could be used to compensate for deficiencies in recordings, or to a certain extent, the room. -Or, even, adjust the sound to match personal taste, or just to crank up the bass when the thunder-sheets are going in the Ring cycle, or for Jack Bruce’s intro to “Badge”. When you look at the much-loved Audio Research SP-3 shown above, what do you see?

Tone controls. Not just the usual treble and bass, but a contour control which altered the slope of the bass and treble controls. They were useful. Not every recording is perfect—in fact,very few are— and those tone controls were particularly useful in the ear-bleeding days of early CDs and certain moving-coil cartridges.

So: where did they go?

As is often the case in the history of high-end audio, credit and/or blame can be ascribed to Harry Pearson. Amidst the numerous pieces he wrote about the SP-3 and its multitude of alphanumeric variants, HP commented that the sound was notably better with the tone controls switched out of the circuit (one of the five push-buttons at the bottom of the faceplate switched out the tone controls). And so it was, largely due to a decrease in noise. If memory serves (and increasingly these days, it does not) one of the changes wrought by the Paoli mod of the SP-3a-1-et al was to eliminate the tone control circuit entirely. Snip-snip.

From that point, the deficiencies of one circuit in one particular preamp were transformed into a philosophical movement of sorts, one whose rallying cry was “a straight wire with gain!!”

The first product from Mark Levinson Audio Systems that I was aware of was the decidedly pro-looking LNP-2 (Low-Noise Preamplifier), designed by pro-side engineer Dick Burwen, complete with not two but three tone controls. (Side note: the LNP-2’s $1750 price tag in 1973 was almost three times the price of the SP-3, and equates to more than $10,000 today.)

But the Levinson product  that broke through in the audiophile world, again courtesy of HP, was the minimalist JC-2 preamp designed by John Curl. See the difference? No tone controls, and the pitch is even based upon that straight line thing. Note that there was no way to alter frequency response, but gain could be adjusted independently for each channel, in 1 dB steps, no less. While channel-matching in volume pots is sometimes inexact, dual volume controls are a pain to live with.–Yes, I digress. Sorry.


By the time Audio Research came out with the SP-6 (the real heir to the SP-3, not the contentious SP-4 and SP-5), tone controls were nowhere to be found. Sniff.

 

And yet, and yet: as Mark Levinson moved on to found Cello, he apparently saw the need for an ultra-sophisticated tone control (or more likely, sensed the market for one). The Cello Audio Palette was more complex and versatile than anything seen since the ancient Altec Acousta-Voicette, the granddaddy of all graphic equalizers. The Audio Palette replaced the grotty sliders of the Altec with  precision rotary controls. Despite the 12 knobs on the unit, only the bottom six altered frequency response—the top six were rather extensive preamp controls.

Like the LNP-2, the Audio Palette was the work of Dick Burwen. In terms of raw geekiness and gadget-lust, the Palette is pretty much the ultimate. I’ve never seen anyone able to walk past one without clicking at least one of the stepped rotary controls.

So: here we are, in an era in which frequency response can be contoured in zillionths of a dB in the digital mode (horrors!). Does anyone do that? Aside from digital crossovers and room-correction devices like those from DEQX, mostly no. One exception: yep, Dick Burwen is still around, and offers Audio Splendor, software-based tone controls and ambience generation. Despite my Luddite resistance to complex mucking about with frequency response—especially through a computer—knowing Dick, I’d bet that it works, and works well.

One problem…there aren’t any knobs!

0 comments

Leave a comment

0 Comments

Your avatar

Loading comments...

🗑️ Delete Comment

Enter moderator password to delete this comment:

✏️ Edit Comment

Enter your email to verify ownership: