Purity vs. minimalism
by Paul McGowan
I can't think of anyone that isn't interested in purity. Pure water, pure truth, pure sound.
While it's comforting to assume that fewer obstacles in the signal path leads to greater purity (simple is better/cleaner), it turns out to not always be correct.
Take recordings for example. It's long been assumed that minimalist miking defines the path to purity. One stereo microphone (or 3 in the famous Decca Tree arrangement) recording the group live has to be pure.
Right?
Not necessarily. If we define purity of sound by the end result, there are multiple examples of multi-miked performances that outperform minimalist recordings.
In the same way we need greater complexity to purify water—boiling, and distilling vs. a simple filter—it's often a mistake to assume minimalism is the path to purity.
Purity is defined by the end product, not how it got there.
Paul McGowan
Founder & CEO
Never miss a post
SubscribeRelated Posts
-
Who knew?
Paul McGowan -
Tooting your horn
Paul McGowan -
The perfection dance
Paul McGowan -
Star grounds
Paul McGowan -
Show thoughts
Paul McGowan
Keep reading
View all-
One Size Doesn’t Fit All: Paul McGowan’s Favori...
When it comes to high-end audio, we can all agree that there's a huge obsession with which pieces of gear sound the way we hope for. Some of us prefer the...
-
Impex Reissues the Bossa Nova Jazz Classic Getz...
Getz/Gilberto is one of the most well-known and well-loved jazz records of all time. Rightfully so: the 1964 Verve release by Stan Getz and João Gilberto is one of the...
- Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
- Opens in a new window.