Quibbles and Bits

    De Vriend’s Beethoven Cycle

    Issue 58

    I wrote in the last issue of Copper about how the Mahler Symphony Cycle has more or less replaced the Beethoven Cycle as the reference standard against which modern conductors and orchestras seek to measure themselves, certainly in the concert repertoire.  One of the problems is that there is almost a saturation in the Beethoven repertoire.  It’s been done so many times that there is less and less room for someone to make a new statement, or showcase a personal approach.  Another issue may be that Beethoven’s canvas can be considered more limited and more limiting than Mahler’s, although that is an argument that tends to find more traction outside of professional music circles than within.

    On the other hand, Beethoven’s relatively more rigid and formalized approach can be used to great advantage to emphasize subtle points of interpretation, particularly in the context of a complete cycle, in much the same way that a Black & White photograph often opens a window to a greater appreciation of composition and character than its color counterpart.  There is also the practical issue that it is possible, if one is of a mind to do so, to audition a 5-hour Beethoven cycle over the course of a leisurely afternoon, something that would be out of the question with a 13-hour Mahler cycle.

    These days, for a conductor embarking upon a new recording of the Beethoven cycle, the vast legacy of Beethoven Symphony recordings that are already out there must surely loom dauntingly.  I recall reading one reviewer’s assertion that there are over 400 complete recorded Beethoven cycles alone, something I find astonishing.  So, whatever your vision might be, there is a pretty good chance that somebody, somewhere, sometime, has already done something similar.  Then there are the great reference cycles to be considered – what can possibly be constructively added to what the likes of Karajan, Klemperer, Bohm, and so forth, have already laid down?

    Over the last three or four decades we have also been treated to the HIP (“Historically Informed Performance”) movement, which seeks to pay homage to the fact that musical instruments in Beethoven’s time were constructed differently, and hence sounded different, compared to contemporary practice.  It, in effect, poses the question “What would these pieces have sounded like at the time they were originally created?”, the unspoken subtext being that whatever it was should most accurately reflect the composer’s intentions.  It is a very valid question from an academic perspective, and makes for a fiery philosophical discussion.  But to my tired ears it more often than not tends to make for unconvincing listening.

    In any case, none of this seems to have put too much of a brake on the continuing output of recorded Beethoven cycles, which do continue to emerge.   And it should be noted that some of them have been very highly praised.  Harnoncourt, Chailly, Jansons, and Krivine have all produced well-received cycles during the last decade although I haven’t actually heard them all (or, in the case of Krivine, even heard of him!).  The cycle I am going to report on here is from another conductor who, until I happened upon this cycle, also occupied a place on my ‘never-heard-of-him’ list – Jan Willem de Vriend.  Do we call him “de Vriend” or just “Vriend”?  I don’t know, but either way I’m already getting pretty fed up with the way my spell-checker keeps changing him to “Friend”.  In this cycle, de Vriend conducts The Netherlands Symphony Orchestra.

    Carlos Kleiber’s 1975 recording of Beethoven’s 5th and 7th with the Vienna Philharmonic stands out – and in my view stands head and shoulders above all others – as a landmark interpretation of Beethoven.  In many ways, it established a new school of thought regarding Beethoven interpretation, but it would take more space than I have here to do that notion justice.  Where, for example, Karajan’s superb 1962 cycle emphasizes phrasing, tonality, and an earnest sense of reverence, Kleiber’s 5th has a lighter, smiling face, and opens our eyes (ears?) to the importance of the tight rhythmic elements of the composition, something with which modern jazz musicians would feel an immediate kinship.  de Vriend’s new Beethoven cycle is very much of the Kleiber school, which, I suppose, is one reason I like it so much.  Especially since Kleiber himself, being possessed of a famously difficult personality, unfortunately did not go on to record a complete cycle.

    “Precision” is the first world that comes to mind when listening to the de Vriend cycle.  It’s what in Rock Music circles we refer to as tight.  Rock star de Vriend would surely have been a drummer.  Every phrase and passage, every instrument, is so precisely delineated that we get to hear unusually deeply into the music.  The phrasing is light and airy, but tightly controlled.  Tempi give the impression of being on the brisk side, but a stopwatch shows this to be mostly illusory.  Above all else, there is a cohesion of purpose across the entire cycle, accomplished to a degree I have never previously heard.  Listening through the entire cycle in one sitting, as I have done several times, each symphony flows naturally into the next, like movements within a single vast work.  What comes across is a combination of conductor and orchestra very much on the same page – each very clearly buying quite enthusiastically what the other is selling.

    Perhaps de Vriend’s most remarkable accomplishment is the way he transforms Symphony No 1 from being a ‘baby brother’ symphony to fully formed mature work.  Once the slightly plodding introduction gives way, it really makes you sit up and take notice.  It is the closest thing you will ever come to hearing a previously undiscovered Beethoven symphony for the first time.  Has de Vriend played fast and loose with the orchestration?  There is a richness of tone and sureness of touch to the development that I haven’t previously associated with the Haydn-esque Symphonies 1 and 2.  I certainly didn’t detect any evidence of such liberties being taken with any of the other symphonies that I know much better.  Either way, as the closing bars of Symphony No 1 bray triumphantly out, your attention will surely have been captured, and you will probably find yourself staying in your listening chair as No 1 gives way to No 2, No 3, and so on.  I’ve lost count of the number of occasions in this cycle where, as a particular movement closes, I just want to do a fist-pump and shout “Yes!”.

    The famous 9th symphony was the first of the cycle that I actually heard, and it prompted me to get the rest of the cycle.  ‘Idiosyncratic’ was the word I wrote on my notepad.  It too had me sitting up from note one, although first time through it was more ‘interesting’ than gripping.  However, it served its purpose, and left me wanting to listen through again, having notched my expectations up accordingly.  The 800lb gorilla in the 9th symphony is the choice of tempi with which to conclude the final 30 seconds of the last movement.  It is quite possibly classical music’s finest and most satisfying climax.  My problem is that, for me at any rate, Karajan’s interpretation rules the roost, and any departure from his inspirational 1962 finale just sounds jarring to me.  And de Vriend’s version DOES depart.  Not in a good way.  No fist-pump.  Big let-down.

    Like I said, more than anything else, what de Vriend has accomplished here is the most coherent Beethoven cycle I have yet heard.  It is not perfect, though.  While his performance of the 1st Symphony may conceivably be the finest on record, none of the other symphonies will likely make anybody’s personal ‘best of’ list.  But this whole coherence thing is not to be under-rated.  It has a magnetic personality of its own.  More than with any other symphony cycle I own, listening to any one of these symphonies makes me want to listen to another, and another, and another.  The nearest I have to a similarly “coherent” interpretive cycle is John Eliot Gardiner’s superbly-recorded 1994 cycle with his Orchestre Révolutionnaire et Romantique.  This breathless cycle is a non-stop thrill ride, comprising truly magnificent versions of the 3rd and 4th symphonies, but taken across the entire cycle it has a sense of relentlessness that can be a bit wearing (in the 6th and 9th, for example, it just doesn’t work at all).  As a cycle, I have always had a soft spot for Karajan’s 1962 go-round, but playing it now, I find myself hearing it as a curation of nine separate performances, rather than as a collective statement.  In the light of these and other well-regarded established recordings, what Jan Willem de Vriend has accomplished with this cycle deserves great credit.  My feeling is that, as it continues to grow on me as a cycle – and it really does continue to grow on me – it will establish itself considerably in stature.  I just wish the ninth didn’t wrap up so frustratingly!

    One last thing to be said about this cycle.  It was recorded by Northstar Recordings in Holland.  This group is making what are quite possibly the finest classical recordings in the world today.  Given that the quality of classical music recording in general is today at an extraordinarily high level across the board, these could quite possibly be the finest classical recordings ever.  Take advantage while you get the chance.  Here I listened in DSD64.  I also have some of their other recordings in their native DXD (24-bit 352.8kHz PCM) format.  [What with Channel Classics also being Dutch, there must be something in the dunes and dykes over there].  It is SUCH a bonus when great music and great recordings come together.

    The folks at Native DSD offer Copper readers a special discount on the de Vriend cycle:

    coupon code CYCLE  gives 25% discount on the Complete Cycle in DSD

    coupon code SYMPH  gives  15% discount on any Symphony in DSD


    Symphonies Nos. 1 & 5: https://challengerecords.nativedsd.com/albums/symphonies-nos-1-5-vol-2

    Symphonies Nos. 2 & 3: https://challengerecords.nativedsd.com/albums/symphonies-nos-2-3

    Symphonies Nos. 4 & 6: https://challengerecords.nativedsd.com/albums/symphonies-nos-4-6-vol-1

    Symphonies Nos. 7 & 8: https://challengerecords.nativedsd.com/albums/symphonies-nos-7-8

    Symphony No. 9: https://challengerecords.nativedsd.com/albums/symphony-no-9


    The codes are valid through the last day of June, 2018 – to give readers ample time to benefit from the discount.


    For the complete cycle, it will look like this in the cart: https://www.dropbox.com/s/nx5yzch172suqde/Screenshot%202018-05-01%2013.43.46.png?dl=0

    One comment on “De Vriend’s Beethoven Cycle”

    1. Hi

      Listening via TIDAL and my Sprout 100. Revelatory recordings that trumps anything I have heard since I started listening in 1960. The DAC helps, of course, along with the high res TIDAL file


    Leave a Reply

    Also From This Issue

    Alamosa Dunes

    There’s a Record Store in Newnan

    Newnan, Georgia, is the little town I live in, just…

    Hadley Labs

    At Axpona a few weeks ago, friend and mentor Richard…

    Hoagy Carmichael, Part 1

    Hoagland Carmichael The sound of the neighbor’s rotary mower preceded…
    Subscribe to Copper Magazine and never miss an issue.

    © 2023 PS Audio, Inc.

    linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram